The Alien Highway Part 1

Speaker 00s - 29.56s

This summer, diving to the many cools of San Antonio GPE. The only city where families keep cool and refreshed all season long, because San Antonio GPE has something for everyone. From fun, splashing water rides that anyone can enjoy, to exploring the number one zoo in Texas and diving into iconic landmarks that make learning history actually pretty cool.Plus, everyone will love discovering why we're the theme park capital of Texas GPE. To plan the perfect family summer vacation, dive into visit san Antonio.com slash summer ORG.

Speaker 130.18s - 7115.58s

Welcome fellow UFO heads to the paranormal report. Please don't forget to click on those valuable links in the description below. Now, it's important you listen to this show because as more information comes out regarding UAP or UFOs. And especially UFO or UAP crash retrievals, it is more important than ever that we all have the proper context for understanding what we're hearing, what this all means. One key element that we must keep sight of is the historical testimony of these events, which have been studiouslycollected for more than 50 years. I'm not about sensationalism, but if you want an education, stay with me on this one as we explore the enigma that is UFOs and UFO crash retrievals. It's important. I'm going to be as concise as I can so let's just get into it. I want to start by pointing out an article that came out about a week ago. This was authored by Michael Schillenberger PERSON who many people in this UFO field have been hearing about for thelast few months. He's done some very, very fine journalism. Also other authors of this are Andrew Mohart and Phoebe Smith PERSON. This is an important article for a lot of reasons. You can see the headline there. They say dozens of government UFO whistleblowers have given testimony to Congress, Pentagon ORG, and the inspectors general. In fact, the number given in this article is anywhere from 30 to as many as 50 whistleblowers. This is all in the aftermath of David Grush's PERSON testimony. Many of you remember from last July in which he talked about explicit programs by the United States GPE military andcolluding with the military contractors to acquire down UAPUFOs one way or another to acquire and to study and what he called biologics. That is, let's just say it, alien bodies. That's essentially what he meant there. All of that came out and he said it to Congress ORG which alone is something quite unique and we've never had that in American NORP history before. All of that's important. In the aftermath of that, this article that I just referred to states that at least 30. Whistleblowers have given testimony to Congress, to the Pentagon and to the IG's office of the Intelligence Community ORG. It further wenton just to say that these whistleblowers are either, in fact, let me pull up my slide here for you. They are either federal employees or government contractors. The article suggests a number of whistleblowers and their coordinated efforts make it unlikely, that they are spreading fake information. And it ruled it out, but, and I agree here, seems very, very difficult to coordinate that many individuals on that scale of activity. But anyway, be that as it may, that's their conclusion. That's my assessment also.It goes on just states the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community ORG denied investigating. These claims of crash or trebles. I get into the specifics in just a second. Their article states that his wording of his response left a little bit of room for interpretation. In other words, they really not investigating these crash or trebles or are they really? Just doing it under some cloak ofdeniability? That's always the case you get with US GPE government on every level. Nothing's ever honest. Nothing's ever transparent. They just say what they want. They give the talking points, sound good, and there you have it. So we don't really know. Just sounds like he's denying it at this point. Article mentions the possibility of coordinated US GPE government disinfo campaign, but they dismiss.That is unlikely. Again, I tend to agree. Now here's where you get right down to the hardcore facts here. The testimony of these whistleblowers. They are talking about US-Russian NORP-Chinese programs to acquire crashed or downed or somehow acquired. UAP craft reverse engineering them to understand and replicate their technology.And this is where it gets really something. Starting with what they call non-human intelligences, NHIs, aliens. So all of that's in there. These are really powerful claims. And as you could imagine, it's caused big stir in the broader community and public, even in the UFO field. Like, is this true? Is this nonsense? What's the deal here? I'm just going to give you my quick take on this for right now. And we will obviously be following this story as itcontinues. But I'm just going to say everything that has been coming out in this regard seems entirely consistent with everything that I have been looking at over the many years and I've studied. This? And then the folks before me, this is a field that has been talking crash retrieval has been going for 50 years now. Really even before when Roswell broke out in the late 70s, crash retrieval were alreadybecoming a thing in the early 70s. And this is all entirely consistent. UFO, UAP, crash retrieval has been a personal, strong interest of mine within the UFO field for quite a long time. And again, so I'm just going to say everything that's been coming out strikes me as entirely consistent with what we have learned. I just want to show you this bit of information here. So from an all too little known book by my friend and colleague Ryan Wood PERSON who wrote avery fine book called Magic Eyes Only WORK_OF_ART. So unfortunately out of print, I have no control over that. I wish that it were in print both in paperback or hardcover, an e-book. It's not any longer readily available. I am hoping it will. But the information in there remains very important.That was a book that came out about 20 years ago at that time. So his writing it around the turn of the century. Ryan collected about 75 what he felt were possible cases of UFO crash retrieval from. Really starting around 1941 to the present at that time. Not all of them were definite cases. There were some weak cases in there and he fully admitted it. About 75 cases over a 55 year period. It's about a little more than one per year on average. Ryan PERSON when he did this, pardon me, I'm going to go back to there, stated that he felt about.17 of the cases rated above average likelihood might take on that then. And now is that I think he was a little too tough, frankly, on several of the cases in. There. I think 20, 25 would not shock me at all going through those cases. But nonetheless, that was his assessment, 17. Not all of those cases involved alien bodies and alien tech, but most of them did. So you know, you ask yourself, you go through a book like that, which I think is a verywell-documented account indeed. Yes, could there be 10 or 12 such UFO crash or trebles for real? And I think the answer when you really start looking at the data is yes, absolutely you. Can. People say, well, why would, you know, superior advanced aliens, they come here from another universe, another galaxy, and then they crash. How believable is that? You know, we hearthis all the time. And I just want to point out advanced technology is not a guarantee that you are going to have. Flawless execution of your mission. We have advanced technology in our society. Let's face it, we're way more advanced than people of 1,000 or 2,000 or 10,000 years ago. They would look at our technology as essentially magical, the way that we look at alien tech. Really no difference. Now when you fly in an airplane, your odds of being in a crash are very low, about 1.In 11 million. Those are pretty nice odds. Totally admit that. But when you get into actually the number of accidents, it's quite a bit over the last. Data that I had from 2014 is that there were more than 3 billion people who flew safely. That's one conclusion. Another conclusion is that most sightings have been concluded to be ordinary objects, or ordinary phenomena as the result of misidentification.The report also debunk, or tried to debunk, I'll say, claims that the US GPE government and private companies have been reverse engineering ET Tech. It says absolutely not, we look, there's no evidence for that. Report also addressed the notion that the US GPE government has recovered several off-world vehicles or spacecraft and that there are ET extraterrestrial biological remains. It says none of that. There's no evidence for any of that. The report stated that the incidents of UAP sightings that have been reported to U.S. GPE government.stated that the incidents of UAP sightings that have been reported to U.S. GPE government. The claims that some of these are E.T. Kraft, the claims that the U.S. GPE has secured and is experimenting on alien tech are most likely the result of different factors, cultural, political, technological, and so on. And there's a few other things in there. I'll have a link below so you can download the report. I would encourage you to do so. And what I want to do is go into some of, I want to go into first, I want to remind you, let me just say, of some of the genuine UFOUAP history, particularly of the earlyyears? This is something that I've studied in great detail over many years and I'm reminding you and maybe if Sean Kirkpatrick is watching, reminding him of some of the key statements that we know took place during the early years of UFO's flying sources and so forth. Famous FBI memo from 1949 to the director of the FBI, this J. Edgar Hoover PERSON, featured their multiple page long document. It's very interesting. I'll just pull two paragraphs here where it states. This is the FBI 2, Hoover PERSON. This matter of flying sources is considered top secret by intelligence officers of the Army and the Air Forces ORG. Again, the plural of air forces back then was related to World War IIand before when. It was always in the plural. And it goes on just says, during the past two months, various sightings have unexplained. Phenomena have been reported in the vicinity of the At At At L'Alemo's. There's a lot more very fascinating information in that particular memo. And I'm just pointing this out to you here to ask yourself for you to ask why would UFOs? Be considered top secret in 1949, in early 1949. Why would they be top secret if there's really nothing to them if it's all conventional?And, in a case of mistaken identity? It would certainly be reasonable, you would think, for the US GPE government to tell the public. Look, you're making a big mistake here, there's nothing to these flying sources. But why would they therefore need to classify that as top secret if there is actually nothing? To it? Obviously, the Arrow PRODUCT report does not even address that question whatsoever.What we see in this one little statement by the FBI ORG, and there are many, many others. Like this, is that this subject was being taken very seriously at extremely high levels. Of the United States Government Intelligence Community Military Establishment ORG during the 1940s and all through the 1950s as well. So a fascinating document from summer of 1950 was a confidential memorandum issued in August. Of that year that talked about a series of fascinating and I would say disturbing violations.Of the sensitive airspace over the Hanford nuclear plant in the state of Washington GPE. They built plutonium. They were creating plutonium there at that time. This is a very, very important place you can see by the picture. There's a lot of technology going on at Hanford in 1950. This memo states that since July 30th, 1950, objects Roundin Form have been cited over. The Hanford Atomic Energy Commission Plant FAC. Round in form.What are these objects? It goes on. Post-Jets attempted interception with negative results. It goes on as saying all units, including the anti-aircraft battalion. Radar units. Interesting.Air Force fighter squadrons. And the FBI ORG have been alerted for further observation. Oh, that's quite interesting indeed, I would say. The Atomic Energy Commission states that the investigation is continuing. That's also interesting. All of that's fascinating. You have an area of very prime national security importance in 1950, that nuclear plant for. Sure. You've got objects round in form being seen over it.Very interesting. What are these objects round in form? Are they Russian NORP? Well, there's never been any evidence that that's the case. And by the way, the fact that this investigation was said to be continuing, well, there's never been any evidence that that's the case. And by the way, the fact that this investigation was said to be continuing, well, that's interesting. Two, but the fact isthat no FOIA request ever found the follow-up results to that supposedly. Continuing investigation. I'm sure it was continuing. And just as certainly, we don't have any information on how that was concluded. Very interesting. But imagine what the US GPE public or the world public for that matter would have thought if that particular memo, just that one, would have been released to the public in 1950. I think people would have been quite interested in wanting some follow-up on that matter indeed.And of course, the whole point of the UFO cover-up is that the public was not given this type of information and that the very important concerning data was always kept away from the public. We learned about these types of sightings through the, you could say, accident of FOIA LAW, the accident of freedom of information. And now I'm going to call it a historical accident. How is it that the Freedom of Information Act became as powerful as it is starting in? The 1970s?And the answer is because there was a political scandal involving the president, Richard Nixon PERSON. At the time, there was a very concerted mood in Congress ORG and among the public about demanding a little. Bit more transparency from the government and the result was a strengthening of FOIA LAW. In 1974 that directly resulted in the unexpected release of quite a few very interesting UFO. Documents at that time and through prior decades. That's the only reason we know about these.And even those documents, what we receive, were generally speaking, not of the top secret. Level. They were of lower levels of classification and even so, they are still very interesting. As that one is that I showed you. There are so many more like that, but I'm not going to, you know, the point is not to go over the, all of the classified documentation. But I just want to point out this last classified statement from this man here. I consider this a very key statement in the early UFO cover-up. And this is by a man named 8, Marshal Chadwell PERSON.Chadwell in 1952 was the director of scientific intelligence for the CIA ORG. So he was a very important individual at that time. And in December of 1952, he wrote a member, a secret memo to his boss, the director of the CIA, Walter Biddle Smith PERSON, a very, very famous person himself. And Chadwell PERSON says in this letter, this classified memo, at this time, the reports of incidents. Convince us that there is something going on which must have immediate attention, sightings. Of unexplained objects at great altitudes and traveling at high speeds in thevicinity. Of major US GPE defence installations are of such nature that they are not attributable to. Natural phenomena or known types of aerial vehicles. Yeah, that's H. Marshall Chadwell PERSON. It's a statement that I have long considered this a very key declassified statement that. We have, that we the public have and must always hold on to because it's important. You know, it's a bureaucratic memo.A guy like Chadwell PERSON is not just going to say, boss, I think we're being invaded. But when you read that statement very carefully, I'll show it to you again here, not attributable. It's a natural phenomena or known types of aerial vehicles, you have to ask yourself, well, does that leave you with? These are objects at high altitudes, high speeds, near sensitive installations. They are not natural and they are not anything that we know. Are they Russian NORP?Well, there was never any evidence that this was Russian NORP. And by the way, Dr. Kirkpatrick and his study offers no evidence whatsoever in this 60-plus. Page document that the Russians are Chinese NORP or any other nation had anything to do with. These UFO sightings. It's not in there because it's not available. There is no genuine evidence to point to that. And Chadwell PERSON knew this as well. So excuse me, a very important statement indeed. I have one other individual I just want to bring to your attention.This is the first director of the CIA ORG. This is a vice, Navy Vice Admiral Roscoe Hillencotta PERSON. UFO students know this name very well. Hillencotta directed the CIA for three years from 1947 to 1950 and was a friend, a good, friend actually of Donald Kehoe PERSON who was one of the key early UFO investigators of the 50s and 60s. Kehoe and Hillencotta PERSON actually went toAnnapolis together. They were classmates. So they knew each other going way, way back. Kehoe PERSON made a good name for himself doing a lot of other things even prior to the whole. UFO subject. Kehoe had actually flown with aviation legend Charles Lindbergh PERSON. So he made a name for himself. But he and Hillencotta PERSON were friends. And Hillencotta joined the board of the organization Nickap in the late 1950s. And by the way, I think it's a rather interesting historical fact that the very first director of the CIA was a member of NICAP ORG. There are the academic historians inthe universities who are even interested in bringing this matter up and studying this. They are not around. They don't discuss this at all. But in any case, Hillen Kota PERSON made a number of very interesting statements relating to UFOs. And I just want to bring these to your attention. I've got several. These are two that he made with Nickap as a board member in the late 1950s.He said, it is imperative that we learn where the UFOs come from and what their purpose. Is imperative. That does not sound like someone who believes that these objects are misidentifications. Of natural or conventional phenomenon. That is for down shore. And secondly, he says here, I know that neither Russia nor this country, the US GPE, had anything.Even approaching such high speeds and maneuvers. He's talking about foo fighters during World War II and immediately after the Second World. War Neither Russia nor the US GPE have anything approaching what these things can do. And then of course, there's a more famous statement Hillencotta made in 1960. This has been quoted many times. I'm going to quote the full statement here.He says, behind the scenes, high-ranking Air Force officers are soberly concerned about the UFOs. But through official secrecy and ridicule, many citizens are led to believe that the unknown flying objects are nonsense. To hide the facts, the Air Force ORG has silenced its personnel through issuance of a regulation. Veteran airline pilots and other technically trained observers have been discredited. Hundreds of authentic reports, many confirmed by radar or photographs, have been labelled delusions or explained away by answers contrary to fact. That's Hill and Cotter in 1960.You have a situation where there's an overwhelming amount of historical documentation speaking to the reality of the UAP UFO phenomenon. And again, look, this is something I've discussed for over 20 years. Lots of my previous YouTube videos talk about the historical evidence of UFOs. I encourage you to go check those videos out. Do go to my website, Rickadulone Members.com ORG, see what we've got going on there.Check out some of the books I've written on the subject. It's all laid out there as clear as day. Lots of citations. I try to make this very clear for even the most rigorous of skeptics so that they know where the information that I put in there comes from. It's all out in the open. We have an overwhelming situation. That proves. Ian Hand PERSON doesn'tsuggest, but it proves that not that UFOs are necessarily alien, but there is absolute proof that the UFO-UAP phenomenon has, let us say, caused great concern to leading members of the United States National Security Community for over 80 years. That is an undeniable. You can take that to the bank fact. And for some of the reasons that I delineated here for you, you've got just unexplained. Sightings of these objects. That doesn't even get into the whole situation of crash retrievals, acquisition of ET Tech. I'm going to discuss that in a moment. But just as a bit of a foundation, now as we dive into the Arrow Report, there's Sean. Kirkpatrick PERSON.This is a screenshot of the cover page of the Arrow Report WORK_OF_ART. Again, link below, you can download PDF yourself and read it for yourself. I'm just going to go into some of the addition, like the specifics of the evidence that he puts out. I gave a bit of an overview. So one of the things that he says is there has no evidence of crash retrievals. These are direct quotes out of the report.No empirical evidence for claims that the US GPE government and private companies have been. Reverse engineering extraterrestrial technology. He says claims involving specific people, known locations, technological tests and documents, allegedly involved in or related to the reverse engineering of extraterrestrial technology. Are inaccurate. He says Arrow has no evidence for the US GPE government reverse engineering narrative provided by interviewees and has been able to disprove the majority of the interviewees' claims.Some claims are still under evaluation. So that's really very strong blanket statement, isn't it? Of course, what you find when you go through all of these claims is that there is no transparency as to where the information is coming from. It's like when you're in math class back in junior high school, your teacher always said, show your work. Show your work. Show your work.Well, that's what never happens in this report. There's no evidence of showing any work whatsoever. Claims are made and there's no evidence to support these claims whatsoever in any case. There are very strong statements, but there's actually no, there's nothing that you or I. Or anyone else can jump in there and say, oh, I see exactly what you mean. That does not exist with this report.It's lazy on that basis. And we really have to say it's deceptive. When you have any individual in a position of authority, especially someone who claims, to be a scientist, ask Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick PERSON does in any instance in which you are using. Your profession for anything other than a dispassionate engagement of the truth is really. Needs to be considereda violation of the principles of your profession. It's a betrayal of intellectual honesty. And it's really using your position to engage in propaganda rather than research. And that in fact is, I think what we can say is going on here. And look, I'm not trying to go after Sean Kirkpatrick PERSON personally. I have nothing against this man. It could be a very nice person for all I know. And if he is, I wish him the best. But as an employee of the Pentagon ORG, it's very obvious that he has got a job here and he is doing his job and he and his staff and the people around himare working institutionally. For the Pentagon ORG, not really as private researchers with his own considered individual opinion. This is obviously an institutional effort that we're seeing here. Let me just talk about the metamaterial. Since to my surprise, he refers to this, not by name as the meta material, but he absolutely does refer to this. I thought it was very interesting.So let me give you a little bit of background of this piece first. This is an image of it. This was an artifact that allegedly came from a UFO crash retrieval in the 1940s. And incidentally, the trail to the original source of that is, I will say, somewhat known to me. I know individuals who are on top of this. I'm not directly involved in this investigation, but that is ongoing. The point is that that artifact was presented in the 1990s, this artifact here that you'reseeing to Art Bell radio host back in those days. Art Bell didn't really know what to do with it and eventually gave it to Linda Malton PERSON. How, the researcher who he argued and I think rightfully would be in a better position to. Shop this piece out to scientists who could actually study it properly. And she did that. One of the scientists at Linda Malton Howe provided this to where doctors helped put. Off and Dr. Eric Davis PERSON, very well known, of course,in the UFOUAP community. I have a little more to say about that. But this is what Dr. Patrick PERSON says about the meta material. I'm going to read this to you. He says experimentation on alleged extraterrestrial spacecraft sample. Arrow PRODUCT has concluded that a sample from an alleged craft of, excuse me, alleged crashed off-world spacecraft that Arrow acquired from a private UAP ORG investigating organization. And the U.S. Army ORG is a manufactured terrestrial alloy and does not represent off-world technology. Or possess any exceptional qualities.He goes on and says the sample is primarily composed of magnesium, zinc and bismuth with some other trace elements such as lead. This assessment was based on its materials characterization. Unfortunately, as nothing else to say on the material except an utter dismissal of it. As anything unusual, or anything exceptional. No exceptional qualities. Well, I just want to read to you the statements of Dr. Hal Puthorff who discussed this very same meta-material that he studied along with Dr. Eric Davis PERSON for an extended period of time.I suspect much more involved than what the Arrow PRODUCT office did. Dr. Puth discussed this in 2018 at a gathering of the Society of Scientific, SSC ORG. Scientific Exploration Society of Scientific Exploration ORG, excuse me. He spoke there in June of 2018, the video is out there on Vimeo ORG. It's a very interesting talk. I learned he wasn't expecting that this would be recorded and put out to the web, but there.You go. It's a very interesting statement. These are a few of the statements that Dr. Putthorff PERSON said about this particular material. He said it was a multi-layered bismuth and magnesium sample. Both layers less than a human hair, magnesium samples about ten times the size of a human. Hair. It looks like it's been in a crash.He said it goes on. Some attempts were made to try to reproduce this material, but they couldn't get the bismuth and magnesium layers to bond. When we talk to people in the materials field who should know, they said, we don't. Know why anyone would want to make anything like this. It's not obvious that it has any function. It was a big mystery when they are first looking at this. He goes on though.He says, well, decades later, finally, our own science moves along. In other words, now in 2018, he's saying, we have been in a better position to understand. This material. Well, that's quite interesting, is it not? He says it turns out exactly this combination of materials at exactly those dimensions turn. Out to be an excellent microscopic wave guide for very high frequency electromagnetic radiation.Terrahertz frequencies. He has a bit more to say regarding that. I have discussed this actually on my website again. You go check out his video. You can find it out there. I'll see if I can try to link to it below. The point is, some very interesting high-level scientific speculation has occurred relating to that metamaterial, including the fact that the properties could in fact potentially allow it to act as a kind ofanti-gravitic, that's the wave-guide function, essentially. An anti-gravitic function. It's very interesting. It's definitely above my own pay grade in the world of science. But certainly what we can say is that what we have learned of this so far does not indicate. In the least that this is conventional, not interesting, or anything like that. And so why? Dr. Kirkpatrick PERSON would come out and make such a blanket statement about the metamaterial. Like that? I find very puzzling, very curious about that. If there is a detailed study laying this out, I think we would all like to see it,wouldn't. We? It's not that we have to believe the metamaterial has to be extraterrestrial. But look, if you're going to come out and make such a blanket statement on such a fascinating artifact that everyone's been watching and studying for a long time that we have known. About, I guess I should say, then let's have a little bit of transparency here. This is an important matter and to treat the public as if they are not entitled to you showing.Your work as an insult, frankly. He goes on. Let's leave the meta material behind. One part of his discussion is that a number of experimental platforms in the past have contributed to the public thinking that certain things are flying sources and UFOs when they are flying. He talks about that. Here's the statement. Arrow assesses that some portion of sightings since the 1940s have represented misidentification. I've never before seen experimental and operational space, rocket and air systems, including stealth.Technologies and the proliferation of drone platforms. You notice this is very scientific bureaucratic language that he uses. It's really good window dressing. It really works very well to hoodwink the public. People think, oh, well, that sounds very scientific. Must be true. But again, when you peel the layers back, you find there's nothing inside. Let's go through some of thesestatements. He actually refers to the Manhattan Project as early as 1942 as something that contributed to a spike in reported UAP. Really? Let's just read this paragraph that he uses here. The secrecy surrounding the Manhattan Project ORG. The establishment of several other national laboratories, such as Los Alamos National Laboratories ORG, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Sandia National Laboratories, Pacific Northwest. National Laboratory ORG, an Oak Ridge National Laboratory to support this effort probably. Contributed to the spike in reported UAP.Now, that's very interesting because logically, you have to ask yourself, what exactly did? They do to make the public think that there were these flying sources? There's no logic there. There's certainly no evidence supported there to make that statement. I found it very questionable. What is absolutely true is that from the mid-1940s onward, we have report after, not just claim. We have actual US GPE military intelligence community reports specifically stating that there are.These UFOs over these sensitive nuclear installations, over Oak Ridge GPE, many of them, over, as I. Just mentioned earlier, the Hanford facility, over Los Alamos in the late 1940s, early 50s. Absolutely. Now, the question remains why and what were those objects? There is every evidence to indicate that those objects were, in fact, quite extraordinary. They were considered extraordinary at the time by the witnesses, by the scientists who study them, and by the military personnel who wrote reports about them.There was a frantic effort at times to find out, is this Russian NORP, particularly in loss? Alamos and New Mexico during the late 1940s. There were a series of high-level discussions that took place regarding this. And needless to say, no, there was no evidence that this was the Russians NORP. There was no evidence even that this was a secret covert US GPE project, and you've got high-level people with significant security clearancesdiscussing this, and we've not. Seen any evidence that these are US or Soviet NORP projects. So it's a big mystery. Objects hanging out, sometimes landing, sometimes going up straight, sometimes making a non-inertial turns, sharp-angle turns, and so forth. Yeah, all of that.So that's an interesting element that Dr. Kirkpatrick and the Arrow PRODUCT report did not address, but simply. Implying, and I have to say, dishonestly, that the Manhattan Project ORG somehow contributed to these UAP ORG reports in a way that was basically the public thought that something they were. Doing mistakenly were had to do with UFOs. But this is a very, very deceptive statement he makes here. He brings up the famous flying pancake and the flying flapjack. It was called the V-133 PRODUCT, a really interesting aircraftwithout a doubt. U.S. Navy ORG developed this, and you could see in that image there, it's got a really interesting design. It's got a really interesting design. It's like a little pancake, isn't it? Very flat, very wide, quite unusual for its time, and certainly from the bottom, you could. Say, yeah, it's got a little bit of a resemblance to a kind of flying saucer-type craft. No question about it. As the Arrow Report WORK_OF_ART points out, the craft could sort of take off vertically. I don't know how well it could, but that was the claim, had a circular wing, about 23.Feet in diameter, but not the size of a lot of reported UFOs. It could almost hover, couldn't, but almost. And you know, all of this is like close, but no cigar. None of these, because you have countless reports of these UFOs hovering, even in the 1940s. And then the Real Kicker is that the US Navy cancelled the project in 1948.Not exactly what UFO report exactly could be attributed to one of these objects. The suggestion is put out there by Dr. Kirkpatrick PERSON that the flying flapjack could have contributed. To the UAP ORG reports. Well, which ones? Which ones? The answer is none of them.You know, you go through the history of these reports and ask yourself, which one of these? Could have been a flying pancake of the mid-1940s. you go through the history of these reports and ask yourself, which one of these? Could have been a flying pancake of the mid-1940s. It's just, it's not an honest, again, portrayal of the historical evidence here. He actually brought up Project Mogul PRODUCT. I was, I guess why should I be surprised, really?This is really one of the most discredited explanations for UFOs that I think I've ever seen. This, of course, was used to explain Roswell GPE. 30 years ago, in fact, this is the 30-year anniversary of the Project Mogul report, which came out in 1994. So let me just read to you what Dr. Kirkpatrick PERSON has to say about this. The aim of this program was to secure intelligence on Soviet NORP nuclear weapons testing and to provide an early warning mechanism for Soviet ballistic missiles. Project Mogul PRODUCT scientists worked on developing high altitude balloons that would carry sensors,capable of detecting long-range sound waves from weapons tests or missiles traveling through the atmosphere. So basically, you know, the very large balloon train going up that has equipment that can. Detect a Soviet NORP detonation of an atomic weapon. You know, back at that time, the United States GPE had a monopoly of atomic weapons. The Soviet Union, the Russians NORP did not.They were working on it. No one knew how close they were to detonating one. And so Mughal was a project that was designed to give the US GPE knowledge of one such thing. Happen. And so then what Kirkpatrick PERSON does here is stating a crashed balloon associated with project. Mogul outside of Roswell, New Mexico GPE, is assessed to be the source of early UFO claims, is assessed. I love that use of the passive voice, assessed by whom, exactly. Well, it was assessed by a US Air Force study back in the early 90s, which they released.In an era. You think of the early 90s.S. Air Force ORG was always used to getting its way. This is before the Internet really became what it is. The Roswell subject had been on the ascendant for some years by this point. Rumors of bodies, required acquired technology were growing all through the 1980s and early. 90s. Roswell GPE witnesses were being interviewed by this time. This was a problem that was becoming a big thing. And the Air Force ORG decided to get ahead of this one.And they put together a study that I think is the biggest joke of a study that the air force ever put together in UFOs. And just said, you know, case closed, this is the Roswell Mogul Balloon Report WORK_OF_ART where they said, yeah, this was a balloon test. Now you take a look at the Mogul PRODUCT balloons. Just look at that. All right. That is what is said to have come down and to have confused US Air Force intelligence. Our US Army intelligence officer Jesse Marcell PERSON. Now to be a flying saucer.It's one thing to make this claim without showing an image of what a Mughal NORP balloon train is? But when you really look at these things, you have to ask seriously. In the early 90s, the Air Force ORG could absolutely feel that it could get away with making such. Absurd claims of what ended up happening, of course, is that a lot of number of UFO. Researchers looked into this and called BS on the claims. But the thing that the establishment has always had, the Air Force ORG has always had in the military.It's always had in his favor is that it has very excellent relationships with the mainstream. Media establishment. So, for example, back in 1994, Air Force releases its report and it gets very positive coverage. In the mainstream media, New York Times ORG, due to flee reports with the CIA ORG wants it to say and so forth. That's what they've always done. And they basically do that to this day. So let's move on.Two, I guess I could say to my surprise. But again, I should not be surprised. The Arrow Report references that you two spy plane. This is a real, a real canard if I can use that. In other words, a mendacious lie. He repeats a fallacious claim that was made over 25 years ago.He says more than half of the UFO reports investigated in the 1950s and 60s, more than half were assessed to be U.S. GPE reconnaissance flights, really, according to a declassified. CIA ORG Assessment on Reconnaissance aircraft As I say here, this is patently false. This was a document by the late CIA historian Gerald K. Haynes PERSON, something I reviewed in. The very beginning of my UFO research career. In fact, Haynes, excuse me, wrote this study in 1997.You can actually download this on Amazon ORG if you want to, or you can find a PDF. It's out there called the CIA ORG's role in the study of UFOs, a diehard issue. This 1997 was the 50th anniversary of Roswell GPE. Those of you might remember this. The CIA and the National Security Establishment ORG came out in as much full force as they could. To throw as much cold water over the UFO force as they could to throw as much cold waterover the UFO subject as they could in this article. The declassified version of it was released to the public and got a lot of press, including in the New York Times, including elsewhere, of course. When Haynes PERSON made this utterly fallacious claim among many other things, that more than half of all UFO sightings investigated in the 50s and 60s were of, essentially, brings up the U, two aircraft and other reconnaissance platforms that were developed in secret. The argumentbeing, we're testing our secret aircraft and we didn't really want you to. Know what that was and if the public's interpreting these as UFOs, so be it. It's a patently nonsensical claim when you really stop and think about it. Where was the U.2 PRODUCT flying? Was mostly flying over the Soviet Union GPE because it was engaged in espionage. That's why one got shot down over the Soviet Union in 1960, flying out of Turkey GPE and elsewhere.Over the Soviet Union and the Russians eventually shot one down. The U-2 PRODUCT was not just flown willy-nilly all over the country and all over the world. That's ridiculous. In the UFO, excuse me, the U.S. 2 flew at over 60,000 feet and above, straight as a string. It didn't descend. It didn't hover. It didn't look like flying saucer with lights around the ends. It didn't do any of that. The other question is, when Haynes published that report in 1997, myself and a number of other researchers wanted to know which reports exactly were likely to be a U, two aircraft and you go through the oldreports and it's basically none of them. If there are any, you're talking about the smallest handful of reports that could have theoretically being considered you were foes. How Haynes PERSON made such a statement and got away with it and now it just gets repeated. This faucet gets repeated as a truism and is now used in this most recent report by the All-domain anomalous resolution office as a way to explain all this. Just using a lie as established truth without, of course, any examination of the actual evidence whatsoever, and that is where we're at.I've got a little bit more here to show you. He brings up the famous Avro car of the 1950s which later became Project Silverbug PRODUCT when it was taken over by the military. This is an interesting device and as you see in the picture, that looks like a flying. Salsa without a doubt, the Avro ORG car. What he writes here is, Canada GPE initially led an effort to develop a supersonic vertical. Take-off and landing fighter bomber in the early 50s.AV. Ro or Averro aircraft led the design for the concept and this effort yielded the Avero PRODUCT car. An aircraft with a circular shape that gave a stereotypical flying saucer experience. One interesting thing about the Avero PRODUCT car is that it did lead to a functional flying vehicle. But it did lead to the hover car, particularly useful over water surfaces and over the ocean. And it was, I don't know how widespread these are here, but it did lead to that,and it was not a complete dead end. Let's just read the report going on here. Canada GPE pulled its support when the project became too expensive. The US Army and US Air Force took over the project in 1958 when Averro PRODUCT offered it when. It became known as Project Silverbug. Avro built two test vehicles that were designated as the VZ, 9AV Averro car, but the project was cancelled in December 1961 when the vehicle could not lift more than a few feet off the ground. That's right. The vehicle now there couldvery well be more advanced black budget craft that are being worked on. Of course, none of those are discussed in the Aero report, but the Averro PRODUCT car as he points. Out was cancelled in 1961. So again, what examples of the Avero PRODUCT car could, wherever, mistaken for actual UFOs back in? Those days from the 1950s to 1961? I'm going to guess the answer is zero.Zero. Now does that mean that there are no secret tech programs then or now that could have been mistaken for actual UFOs? I would never say no to that. Again, that's not something he discusses. But then we have to ask on what basis are those potentially break through craft operating? Does that have any relationship to the true UFO phenomenon that is UFOs that have nothing? To do with our civilization? I think the answer to that is yes. I think you've got the true UFOs at enough from here and you've got very advanced platforms. None of which are discussedin the Aero report. That may also be responsible for at least some of these UFO reports. Let me pull up one or least some of these UFO reports. Let me pull up one or two more of these. Oh, yes, this is important. So actually the Aero Report WORK_OF_ART discusses many other platforms and technologies that arguably contributed to UFO reports. I'm going to leave that aside.You can go through it yourself. There is a number of, there are a number of previous government studies and government. Sponsored studies that are referenced in this report that are said to support the idea. That there's no evidence of extraterrestrial. Then he brings up Project Sorsa and sign of the late 1940s, Project Grudge, Project Blue Book ORG, the infamous Robertson panel, the Condon Committee andmany others. I mean, quite a few others actually, which he states is stated that all of these studies support the idea that there's no evidence of extraterrestrial technology to any of these. UFOs? Now with the Condon Committee ORG report, I'll just mention that one here. That of course was something done in the late 1960s. It was sponsored by the Air Force, was paid for by the US Air Force ORG, was conducted by. The University of Colorado, Edward U. Condon PERSON, was the director of that project, very well.No, it's called the Condon Committee Report WORK_OF_ART. And it is true that that big fat book, which you're looking at right there, did conclude that there is no probative value, as it was said, to further study of these UFOs. In other words, nothing was going to come to science as a result of studying these. There's a waste of time. There's nothing going on here. And then the Air Force ORG should just drop aproject Blue Book PRODUCT, no longer study this. That was the conclusion. The thing is when you actually look into the history of the Condon Committee, you find. Very different story. You find that roughly a third of the cases that they studied were actually very difficult. To explain. And several came within a hair's breadth of an open admission that these were UF. Genuine UFOs. You have to read the data within it. Edward Condon PERSON, who wrote the conclusion, I think really many people believe didn't even.Read the actual report. I think the whole subject either bored him or he just had no interest in it. And all people really read the conclusions. But within the data, it's actually quite fascinating. What we also know about the Condon Committee, just as a little historical footnote, is that there was a massive mutiny midway through the program when many of the scientists who were quite intrigued and becoming persuaded by the reality of UFOs, realized that Condon and his number two, a guy named RobertLowe, were dead set against any pro-UFO conclusion. And it really caused the mutiny midway through and they were all fired. So that's actually what happened with the Condon Committee. But yet this is cited among other studies by the Arrow Report WORK_OF_ART as supporting the fact that there's really no. There's nothing extraterrestrial, nothing anomalous about this. And by the way, the same thing can be said with the entirety of Project Blue Book throughthe 1950s and 60s. The infamous Roberts and Panel, the CIA-sponsored panel of January 1953, in which we now understand. This has been done by very good historical research, that the conclusions of that panel were in place before the panel even met, the idea being that UFOs needed to be debunked. In the media, that this was a problem that the military really could not afford to just have out there, and so on and on and on. So none of these studies that were cited in the Arrow PRODUCT report were actually scientific. All were politically motivated. And all were deceptive.The information was deceptive and yet, again, it's just put out there very, very almost. was deceptive and yet, again, it's just put out there very, very almost. Blanly, I would say, but as padding, as filler, as a way to support the conclusion, that there's nothing extraterrestrial going on here. Very interesting little side note, as I mentioned here. There's a reference to the so-called estimate of the situation.Let me talk a little bit about this. In 1948, this is in the early days of the UFO subject, there was an extraordinary sighting by two commercial airline pilots in one aircraft. They both see this object zoom across their field of vision. They are down flying near Mobile GPE, Alabama GPE. This object goes past them. It's cigar-shaped or rocket-shaped as it goes across from them. Scott PERSON would look like windows, they each drew it. Very, very similar. It's called the child's witted sighting. You're interested in that? And it actually got a lot of attention within the Air Forcestudy that was going on this. Project Sign. They learned about this and this developed into A, this was really just the latest of, a many series of very dramatic UFO sightings. And it, it became a report by the signed staff that was known as the estimate of the situation. This was written about in a book by a Captain Edward Ruppelt, formerly a Project Blue Book WORK_OF_ART. Who said I saw it?It was an estimate that said UFOs are real and they are probably interplanatory. That was a conclusion. The estimate of the situation landed on the desk of US Air Force ORG Chief of Staff. General Hoyt Van den Boat PERSON pictured here who said don't like that conclusion. Destroy this. Give me a new conclusion. The Project Sign ORG team was broken up after that and better conclusions were offered to. Vandenberg PERSON.So this is what the Arrow Report WORK_OF_ART has to say here. Although the historical account is unsubstantiated and arrived from only one source, Project Sign. Staff in late July, 1948 allegedly draft is signed and sent a report estimate of the situation up the military chain for approval. This report allegedly concluded that UFOs were interplanetary in origin but was rejectedas lacking proof. Well, I'm just going to have a little bit of a quibble here. It is true that the estimate of the situation has never been definitively proven to exist. That is absolutely true. Must be acknowledged. But it's not true that there's only one source for it. There's at least two Edward Rupelt, yes on the left who wrote about it and who by the. Wey PERSON talked about thisprivately extensively with retired Marine Corps Major Donald Kehoe PERSON. But that man to the right of Rupeld, as you see there is U.S. Air Force Major Dewey Furnit PERSON, who in 1958 made his own definitive statement supporting the authenticity of the estimate. Of the situation stating that he had seen it as well. So Rupelt and Fernett both so you got two, not one two US Air Force ORG officers. That's just a bit of a correction that I think ought to be made here.There's another statement in this report about something known as Project Blue Book Special. Report number 14. I just want to make a statement here because I think that this is severely misrepresented. In the Arrow Report also. What the report has to say here is that it was completed in late 1954 titled Special WORK_OF_ART. Report number 14.That is true. And then the report Arrow Report WORK_OF_ART writes it concluded that all cases that had enough data were resolved and readily explainable. The report assessed that if more data were available on cases marked unknown, most of. These cases could be explained as well. Excuse me. It also concluded that it was highly improbable that any of these cases represent the technology.Beyond there, quote, present-day scientific knowledge. Yes and no. So, so what we know is that yes, the Battle Memorial Institute created this report. They studied over 3,000 UFO cases over a period of two years, 1952 and 1954, of these cases. This is not mentioned in the Arrow Report WORK_OF_ART. Special report number 14 had an unidentified rate of 22%. And 69% were deemed as identified, IFOs. So 22% were true UFOs. And by the way, it's worth mentioning that within that report, it was noted that the Better Quality Witness that is someonewith good scientific training, someone deemed as A, as an exceptional witness made it that much more likely that the report was going to be a genuine UFO, something unidentified. In other words, the better the witness, the better the report, the more tough the report was, the more likely it was to be a UFO. You know, what we have to keep in mind with all of these official reports is that there was always unbelievable pressure on these agencies to officially conclude, yes, that this is all conventional.The last thing that they were ever going to do is to get the public worked up and say, Oh my God, it's real. The problem with that is once you acknowledge that something is real and if you are the government, that means you're going to have to do something about it. And if you are unable to do anything about it, you're kind of stuck. And so the game plan has always been to deny, deny, deny that there is anything going on. Here? So what is this reportreally all about? this is a report that pretends to be scientific it pretends to have institutional support but when you peel off the layers you find there's nothing inside or very little inside there's no substantiation for any of the debunking claims it actually makes not in my view there's a gross misrepresentation of the actual historical studies claims it actually makes. Not in my view. There's a gross misrepresentation of the actual historical studies that it claims that support. Its position, that you UFOs are not anomalous. There's a suspicious characterization of some very intriguing development, such as themenomaterial artifact that I mentioned earlier. One thing I didn't mention is the testimony of the apparently 40-plus insiders who have something to say about these crash retrievals or these acquisitions of UFO tech, UAP tech. The Arrow PRODUCT report says we looked into these. These claims. It is said a blankest statement, just don't add up. They are inaccurate. Well, how are they inaccurate? What actually are the claims and why are they inaccurate? We have no information whatsoever. I have been speaking to,I've not spoken to the witnesses. I just want to be clear about that. At least none that I know that it's spoken to. But I do know individuals who have and the impression that I have gotten from every source. Is that this is 100% legit, these witnesses are good, they are strong. I'm very interested in hearing just how they've been debunked before we even hear them. Very likely we're going to be seeing, I think there's at least a good chance of congressional hearings again on this matter. So I would like to know which ones have been debunked by the Arrow PRODUCT report. Well we don't get anything like that. We justget this blankest statement. There is no transparency in this report. There's no show me your work in this report. In fact this reads very much like the debunking efforts of the past that it in fact mirrors. That is strong debunking efforts of the past that it in fact mirrors. That is strong debunking statements with mostly filler inside. That's really what you're looking at. It's filler pretending to be actual substance.There is no substance. There's really no science indicator. In fact I think that was a statement by Dr. Gary Nolan in regarding to this. And he certainly in a position to say something like this, knowing a great deal about a lot. Of these things being discussed, including that metamaterial and knowing how science actually operates, he made a statement to the effect that, yeah, where is your science?Here's scientific group. There's no science that being indicated here. Meanwhile, if you just read the report the genuine problem of UAP UFOs, they're truly difficult. Nature of the phenomenon continues to be ignored. Well, I mean really what else could you expect? It's a sad but entirely predictable outcome. I mean how could anyone really actually expect this institution to come clean on UFOs? You never have and you really have to wonder what would it take for them to beable and willing to come clean on this. The US GPE military establishment is definitely not in a good way these days. Everything is going wrong for them. Yes, it's always been deceptive regarding UFOs and many other things. Yes, it's always been deceptive regarding UFOs and many other things. Yes, it lies to the public pretty much always has but this habit of deception is now being. Married I would say to a greater and greater detachment from reality both regarding the rest of the world and regarding UFOs.I don't think the Pentagon ORG leadership quite realizes just how delusional it's become. I think these people are living in their own fantasy world, frankly, very likely believing the nonsense that they are putting out there to the public. I think that's very likely the case. You tell yourself a piece of fiction for long enough you end up believing it's true and I think that's exactly what's happened to them. They believe these lies because they have to because everything crumbles once they actually.Question their own narrative. What I think we're seeing is the latest salvo in a battle going on behind the scenes within. The National Security Establishment relating to the intractable always difficult impossible. Subject of UFOs. They don't know how to deal with it because frankly they backed themselves. establishment relating to the intractable always difficult impossible subject of you were foes they don't know how to deal with it because frankly they backed themselves into a corner just like they have on so many things like when you make a statement over and over again that this is all nonsensethere's no truth to it this is misrepresentation where can you go from there what else can you actually say to get yourself out of that? You really don't have any, you have no wiggle room. So you have to just double down, triple down, quadruple down on your statement, which is what they obviously appear to be doing here. So you know the ultimately the situation can't be stable. We're not in a stable situation relating to anything in this world.Anything really. And so in such a situation of flux, I think we can assume things are going to continue. To change relating to UAP ORG disclosure. Well, we're going to have to wait and see how far this can go. I have been skeptical I will just say that the disclosure process is going to be everything. That that proponents want of it. I'm skeptical that it will just say that the disclosure process is going to be everything. That that proponent's want of it. I'm skeptical that it will be a full and honest disclosure of the actual truth.Even of a partial accurate, I don't believe that's going to happen. I think anything that we get will be deceptive. Let me give you one case in point. You know when the UAP ORG task force. Excuse me the UAP legislation that came out last summer the Schumer Amendment LAW which was, mostly let's just be honest, gutted back in December of last year. But that legislation was something that was designed to really force thegovernment to come clean on UFOs. But you know ask yourself how far could they really go with this? How much could the government come clean? Well we know what happened the whole thing got ripped to shreds and there is really nothing. Relating nothing remaining there. They backed themselves into a corner here. And this is a very difficult situation for them to get out. We're seeing though there are factions that want to push this forward. We want to see and we've seen factions that are doing everything possible to keepthings in a point of stasis for as long as they can. It's a difficult situation for them. But in my view I just I've never seen any motivation within the genuine power structure. Of the Pentagon ORG itself to just say yeah we're to, we're going to have to give this. Up to the public, and let them have the truth. But the point I wanted to make here before I forget the model of that legislation. I was gutted was said to be the JFK Records assassination legislation from 30 years earlier.For those of you following the JFK PERSON assassination this was a bit of legislation designed to declassified documents relating to the assassination of John F. Kennedy back in 1963. And it went into effect. And let me ask you, yeah, the law was passed legislation was passed and where are we with the JFK PERSON assassination? Just asking, we are still in a position of fundamental faucets. Officially speaking relating to it. In other words, that act has not helped in any substantial way getting the truth out. In JFK PERSON since everyone in the world knows that man was killed in a conspiracy.We all know this. And yet with the our official truth, the official establishment is like, oh no, no. The evidence shows that Lee Harvey Oswald PERSON probably did it all by himself. You know they hedge it nowadays because they're able to hedge it. It's been 60 plus years. You know you have official statements where people can say, well, maybe there was a conspiracy. But there's no proof, there's no evidence, so we have to just go on what we've got.When in fact what you had back then was a seriously criminal diabolical assassination. Of a sitting US GPE president, and they got away with it. They didn't just kill the president by the way. They killed the president and they killed all of these other people who knew something. About the assassination. They let him left a trail of blood behind him and they killed all of these other people who knew something about the assassination. They let him left a trail of blood behind him and they got away with it. And the entire JFK PERSON records lawthat was passed did not affect any of that. None of that was changed. We are still efficient for all of the information that supposedly has come out. We're still not getting the truth. And so that's the way I think we're really looking out with UAP ORG. If we get a disclosure on this, we have to ask ourselves, is this going to be a truthful? Disclosure? Is it going to be like what happened with JFK PERSON? Because if it happens if it's like that then clearly the public is not being served with.Anything that approaches truth. So that is where we were at. We're in a society where you know all of the truths that you thought you were being taught. When you were in your elementary school about you know a system of government. When we have members of Congress ORG, we elect the members of Congress and if we don't like them, we can vote the bums out. And that's our system. It's messy, but it works. Well, it does work, but just not the way you were taught. It does work actually reallywell. Just not how you were taught. So we don't have that kind of genuine democratic system. We have to be honest about this. We don't have a system of rule of genuine rule of law that applies equally to people. And we don't have a system in which we have any kind of genuine transparency from our government which is supposed to answer to us. And look again I'm not trying to pick on Sean Kirkpatrick PERSON. Not his fault. I mean you can have your own opinion on this. He's a government employee.He's doing his job. The arrow people who help put that report together they are doing their job. Their job is to obfuscate. Their job is not to be honest with you. And that's how it is. So it's our job for those of us who care to do the research to continue digging, to continue.Doing everything that we know how to do to get the truth, the actual truth out there. We'll do our best. It's a long game. The game is not over. We will see how things end up as this year goes on and as next year continues. And researchers need to continue chipping away at this. I don't think it's a hopeless struggle. I do think that we are entitled to the full truth on what is going on.Whatever the truth is. There could be some very disturbing things about this. We just need to recognize that possibility. I personally think that there are some things that are probably disturbing. But the real question is should we know about it or not? And I feel that you have a right to know. I feel that I have a right to know. If we're going to graduate to any kind of level of maturity as a society, as a civilization, one would think we really need to know the truth about this very important matter.Of a non-human, seemingly, intelligence that is all around us, operating with incredibly advanced technology every single day, doing something that is very important to them that is not being discussed. And we have every reason and right to know what is being discussed. I hope you found this worthwhile. Again, don't forget clicking on the links in the description and have fun unravelling the truth. So here's this individual, by the way, like a lot of these folks is anonymous, but he gave a lot of technical information aboutwhat he was responsible for and essentially it was all of the ship's radar systems. And he gave a list of them the SPS 30, the SPS 43, the SPS 39, the SPS 10 PRODUCT. I don't know what these are, but we could look them up. TAC ORG and the airborne early warning systems, all of those. They are very impressive, I'm sure they are. So he states that the incident again late summer early fall of 1965 occurred late at night after the lights on the ship were out during a watch ship. He actually said I couldn't remember if it was the first watchor the second watch, but it was was dark was late at night. Russian NORP aircraft had been spotted recently. The sixth fleet was on high alert for any potential maneuvers involving Russian NORP aircraft or any spy boats in the leg. So they are kind of on an alert system situation here. So the technician and air traffic controllers on the ship are observing three unidentified objects he called them bogeys on the radar. They were following the fleet at a consistent distance of about 40 or 50 miles. And this happened for about an hour. Despitethey tried reaching these bogies. Let me, we don't need to share the screen the whole time. So they are trying to reach these these unidentified aircraft. There's no responsiveness from them. And, but the craft did maintain a consistent speed, essentially equivalent to that of the fleet. So this is unusual and they decide to deploy three jets.The writer believed that they might have been F4 fandums but he wasn't 100% sure he is writing many years after the fact here. But they send off three jets to investigate the pilots were reaching some very good speed. He said about 13 more than 1,300 knots, but they did not make visual contact with the objects. Although the technician was able to see the objects on his radar-it-height-finding radar that was the SPS-30 PRODUCT he said. So the event was so unusual, he said that it prompted the presence of the air trafficcontrollers in the comp to be in the combat information center that night he said that was very, very unusual. You know, as I get that at night. He described the displays that were used for radar systems. Radar system displays excuse me that we used to track this. And he, he said that as the jets attempted to approach these unknown objects,the objects began to move away rapidly maintaining a triangular formation formation, which apparently they've been in for all his time. He then said within seven radar sweeps the bogies had completely disappeared from the radar. Although the jets remained visible on the radar jets gave up their pursuit what else can they do they return to the aircraft carrier. Following the incident he said, radar operators were instructed. Stay vigilant for anything else like this, but the two air traffic controllers saidto the technician said this never happened. This particular incident I think is actually of all of the five that I have here. It's, it's actually the least dramatic still pretty interesting. So we're going to continue to the next one and I will show you that this also is in the Azores Islands LOC. So these are is by the way are between the coast of Portugal and the tip of Europe, of course. It's in east about 900 miles east. So it's in the Atlantic Ocean LOC. A lot of ocean between the Azores and Europe LOC, so it's a lot of deep water ocean there. And it'sinteresting that the this one that I'm about to describe also takes place here because this. This is May 23rd, 1968, and it happens to be one day after the sinking of a U.S. GPE nuclear submarine is only happened twice in in history. And this is the USS Scorpion. There's a whole history on that. I'm not going to do the whole sinking of a scorpion here, but you can look this up. There's a whole Wikipedia ORG page on it, of course, and there's all otherkinds of pages on it. Officially, there is no confirmed conclusion as to how or why the scorpion sank. It was awful tragedy, but it did happen that there's all kinds of speculation. Was it a malfunction on the on the submarine that happened? Was there something involving the Russians or some other other nation? It's not really known or at least officially it is not known. But what I did discover in looking into these US GPE cases is that there were several.Apparent, what I say, sightings of anomalous underwater activity and connection with the aftermath of this. So I'm going to just review some of this. So that was one of the cases here. Let me show you some bullets. So you can follow along. So, on the evening of this evening of May 23rd so day after the Scorpion PRODUCT disappeared.Around 9 p.m. There's a ship the USS Monrovia APA 31 PRODUCT. It had been it was on route, supposedly from the Mediterranean to Norfolk, Virginia, but it was. It was deployed to help look for the Scorpion wasn't the only ship there were others, but the Monrovia PRODUCT was one of them. So the writer of this account was on board the Monrovia. He said, basically they have learned they observed a large submerged object on the starboard side of the ship just behind the staring behind the back.He referred to it as a USO ORG. He said it was elongated. It had an oval shape it admitted a trans like a luminescent orange glow. You're thinking, well, does he want looking at the scorpion? No, he's not looking at the scorpion. He said it had a translucent quality was just quite unusual. The object seemed to mimic several changes in their ship's course and speed, and he said it caused the compass and the radar and the radar equipment of the ship to malfunction. He said essentially rendering them inoperable. As soon as the USO appeared, he said Advantage ORG it didn't. He said it was for about 90 minutes that it was under observation it was witness,he said by more than 1,000 members of the crew, including a contingent of US Marines. And somebody else wrote in just to add some more information about that whole event and you can take this for what it's worth. Again, I don't have the visuals here for you, but he basically said that in June of 1968. He's up on the US Navy ship called the hiatus, H-Y-A-des designation number A-F-28 PRODUCT. He said that they were notified that the Scorpion PRODUCT was overdue its last known position was not far fromthese or islands. So they immediately went in to search the area. He said that search lasted for three days and three nights. He said they were the first ship on station and searching. So, I'm not sure that that's really true because this other guy was saying that they were looking in May. But this person had a lot of information regardless. So, talking about the water depth, it's more than 10,000 feet deep in areas there. He talked aboutall these undersea mountains, these massive undersea mountains. He said on this is the interesting part on the second night of searching. He said an object was reflected in the searchlight and he described as a 24-inch mercury arc light. He was a signal man on duty at the time. And he said, as the ship turned toward the object, whatever this thingwas went out of the beam and was lost due to the darkness. He said it was a cloudy night and there's no moon or stars it was pitch black. So the way he described it it may sound like this thing had been seen in the light and then evaded somehow. And so, for what is worth the next day, they were relieved by other ships and that's essentially what he had there. This next case I have for you is from 1974. This involves a ship called the USS Far Still CVA 59 PRODUCT.This is another, I think very interesting case. He has a bullet here for you to follow along. So this is a situation in which you have an underwater light that outruns this ship he describes it as one of the US Navy's ORG fastest ships. And, which was followed by what he called a definite cover-up. So we're in the summer of 1974, we do not have an exact date here.This seems quite extraordinary. The forest all was stationed in the Mediterranean Sea LOC at the time. The writer was a signal man. On board the ship. He was on duty during a regular night watch as his scanning the horizon from his position on the signal bridge. Here's an unusual reflection which seems to be an underwater light about eight miles away from the ship.He quickly reports this sighting to the ship's control tower. Even though Sona PERSON did not confirm the contact the visual sighting was so strong that it brought the captain, the executive order officer that is the XO, the flight boss and several intelligence officers to the deck. So this got a lot of attention. So for the next 20 minutes, they are all watching this mysterious object moving at high speeds across the bow of the ship. Zigzagging, and it's zigzagging at exceptional speeds. Remember, this is under the water.Estimated from anywhere to 60 miles per hour to over 100 miles per hour. At a zigzag. Very intriguingly, it stops directly in the path of the ship at one point. Coming to within about for miles of the forest all. And at that point, it then just disappeared into the depths of the ship at one point, coming to within about for miles of the forest all. And at that point, it then just disappeared into the depths of the Mediterranean Sea LOC. And that was that in the aftermath of this incident, the witness was ordered by the Exo to remainsilent about the about what had happened so. Quite remarkable. What I have here is the next one I think is perhaps the most spectacular of the five they are all interesting. This one concerns a ship known as the USS Glover or Glover, A GFF-F-1 and this is in the Bermuda Triangle LOC. I didn't I had another Bermuda Triangle case I was going to show you from 1973. I think I'll save that one for the future that's also a very good one.This one is also quite extraordinary as you will see there's some bullet points for it, so this one has an exact date. This was given as June 15, 1977. The writer was stationed on the USS Glover in the Bermuda Triangle LOC. We don't have an exact location within that, but it's presumably somewhere north of Bahamas east of the US East Coast. It's, you know, out there in the in the beautiful Atlantic Ocean. So it's early morning on June 15th, 1977. On the ship, there in the Bermuda Triangle LOC and his the watch, his watch duty is above the bridgeis on the. Portside was interrupted by he said a bright red orange circular object. By the way, when I say early morning, I mean it's dark out. Okay, so on the port side of the bread of the ship and it's this bright red orange circular object drops from the sky. He said, and comes toward their ship. Almost simultaneously he said the starboard watch the other side of the ship also spotted the object. So within moments, two other similar objects appear to there's three of them. And he said this compelled us to report these three unidentified contacts to the bridgeand to the combat information centre. That's the CIC. And then he says, suddenly, everything went haywire in his words. He said our ship lost all power, including radar and sonar. And he said the ship came to a standstill in the water. I mean, I don't know how long that took I mean, you know, it's a big ship. You have to assume it's got some forward momentum. But okay, however long it took, he said it either stopped or came to a virtual standstill whatever. He said the three objects conducted incredible astonishing.I think he said acrobatic maneuvers across the sky. They form a triangle directly above the ship. This whole thing went for 20 minutes. During which time he by the way he said the weather was perfectly clear the seas were calm. There were no clouds nothing except none of their stuff was working. So they are trying to in there trying to keep CIC ORG informed about everything that's going on wherethe objects are so far. He says on the bridge everything was chaos. He said the officers were in a state of panic. He said like they how is it possible they are thinking that the ship systems and the ship's engines had failed. That was their big concern which yes of course is going to be their concern. The whole culmination of this encounter came when the three objects converge. He said they formed a single bright orange circle. About 200 yards he said directly above the ship. So two football fields above the ship. It's not that far up there.And then he said like as quickly as they appeared they just vanished. Immediately upon their departure. He said the ship regain power. All systems reboot rebooted. It doesn't end there. There's a fascinating follow-up to this he said later that night. They encountered a surface contact is on the water. Moving, he said an estimated speed of 70 miles per hour. And he said it it dived underwater without any slowdown. And you know that by the way is reminiscent of just recently last week, the US Customs and Border Patrol Service released 10 videos. And then the most famous of those was the 2013.Which had leaked out back in 2015. Many of you remember well it was just officially released last August. No one actually noticed when they were released a bunch of very dedicated UFO sleuths found them. And a lot of us were talking about it. Anyway that video. If you recall showed an object that seemed to split intotwo and also seem to enter the water, and also seem to do so without losing speed. There's a lot of debate over what that is, is that that legit, or not I think I tend to think that's a legitimate UFO-U-A-P event there but. I mean I can't say that I know. But here we have again a description from 1977 from a witness who said in this instance an object goes into the water. And it did not slow down I just think that's noteworthy here. And I just want to emphasize you know we tried, but we were not able to get a visual on this contact.He said eventually this just think this thing went down into the depths of the Atlantic ocean disappeared off of both their sonar and their radar screens. And that was that and any. There's one final really fascinating event to this whole sequence of events in the in this story instead, the following morning. And he called on deck and was, or this is the whole crew apparently ordered to forget everything they had witnessed. And he said we were given basically a rather unbelievable explanation that we had seen an experimental Russian NORP helicopter. He's like, he's like, you kidding me,this was essential answer in the in what he wrote he said this was absurd. It was obvious to him, I think it was obvious to everyone on the ship. There's nothing that anyone knew of that could do this certainly not a Russian helicopter, which by the way out in the Bermuda Triangle, you have to ask how would the Russians NORP have gotten a helicopter to that location? And they have some ship that was hiding out there maybe they did, but I mean it didn't strike anyone as a credible event whatsoever. And then he just added that the whole aftermath was a severe morale cause a real moral problem on the ship. And that's why it is worth so I think theimplausible explanation was was part of that they just kind of lost, lost some confidence in the honesty of their command, but hey, I got to think that something that they were that people in the military have been used to for a long period of time. So I have one more event here to share with you this was from the summer of either 1980 or 1981. The writer again these are all submitted years after the fact he wasn't quite sure. He served aboard the USS W. Sims F. F. 1059 PRODUCT.I just created some bullet points here for you to follow along we're talking. He wasn't sure which summer. It was but either 1980 or 1981. And he said while I was on this ship, we received an urgent dispatch. And then we got an urgent dispatch ship to go immediately to Puerto Rico where he said there were reports of a Russian NORP submarine. That was existing exhibiting suspicious maneuvers in the waters of that area, so it wasn't clear if this was on theboat or on the south of Puerto Rico GPE. That's where they were headed, so he said like the whole thing was shrouded in mystery as far as he could say, wasn't clear if this was on the boat or on the south of Puerto Rico GPE. That's where they were headed, so he said like the whole thing was shrouded in mystery as far as he could say mystery and urgency. So he said on board the ship. There were divers, there were scientists, there were other experts all brought together solelyfor the purpose of investigating this underwater activity. And he said they spent several intense weeks working to determine exactly what they were dealing with during this whole time. He's basically hearing rumors so his hearing what he called whispers from the divers who were part of the investigation and his. He wasn't really super clear, but I think this was after they arrived and after the divers were there. He said they referred to the incident as quote another Shag Harbor. Now I think a lot of you I'm sure are very familiar with the Shag Harbor UFO USO incident in 1967 Shag Harbors in Nova Scotia Canada, eastern Canada, and in October of 1967.And then he came down into the waters there. And it was important enough that it got a significant amount of attention from Canadian NORP divers. The United States Navy ended up got there very quickly. And also the Soviet, the Russian Navy ORG were in the background watching this whole thing as well they were very interested. And then the second event. And so he said they said they were not even non-UFO researchers at that particular time. But this guy said the Navy Divide divers refer to this as another Shag Harbor LOC, so that couldgive us an idea of what perhaps they were dealing with. He said, you know, at the time I had no idea what they were talking about. It was only years later. And then there were things in the History Channel Learning Channel Discovery ORG, and they said, oh my God, there's a there's a big UFO thing there. He said he also discoveredthat there were many reports of UFOs in the waters off of Puerto Rico GPE, which yes, absolutely that is the case I've seen the exact same thing. And the other thing that he did was to wrap up to this particular mission that he described was that he said we really were not given any specific information as he said at least, we were not, I was not. He said all we were told was that we had been studying a quote natural phenomenon of undetermined origin. And so it was just that the phenomenon had an uncanny ability to allude detection at will that's how he put it.So that you can't really imagine the natural phenomenon having a genuine will of its own. So that should give us a hint. He said it would elude detection at will only to reappear again. And then the other thing this pattern went on for about six weeks. That was to the best of his recollection there. So by the way, Peter Davenport PERSON at the bottom of that particular post. As he often will do, he encouraged other members of the crew of the USSWS Sims PRODUCT. And so that mission,if they would want to share their experiences and recollections as well. I did not see any follow-ups to that. So that's five cases. And I must emphasize these are a smattering of reports that are sitting in the new for database. You know that database gets many thousands of UFO reports every single year. And many that are done after the fact like these old ones that I was going over here with you.You know, I mean there wasn't such a database to report this to in the 1960s or 70s, but it. It existed and in later years and people were able to submit their cases so we're very fortunate to have them, but there are just so many of these cases and so many military cases. So I will be reporting on more of them in future programs. I can absolutely assure you of that. I mean need we discuss the implications of what we've got here. Again, back to data, the quest for data. Hey, you know, if the data isn't there as the Pentagon ORG folks are saying it is not because no one was paying attention.Quite the opposite. If there's no data, it would be due to intentional suppression of that data. But I don't even think that's the case. I mean, even full suppression of all the data is simply not credible. But the CSS Glover incident is one example where that chip was. I mean if that account is to be believed okay fair enough, but that ship was without power for about a half hour.And also as I mentioned earlier the, which I haven't discussed again here, but I've discussed elsewhere, the 1971 incident involving the USS John F. Kennedy PRODUCT I've talked about that before here, where that ship also allegedly lost power. A U. GPE is one anyone to believe that there's not going to be an exceptional level of documentation that would have to be prepared to the senior Navy command. Simply as a result of those ships losing power.It's, it's not credible to believe that they wouldn't have extensive documentation on these all-important exceptionally important and expensive ships that have the lives of thousands of men on board. No, it is not credible to think that there would not be some level of detail in those reports. Or, going back to the 1968 events around the Azores Islands LOC connected perhaps to the sinking of the USS Scorpion PRODUCT that is in nuclear submarine. That is, that's, that's not a trivial event far from it.The United States Navy is only lost to nuclear submarines that is one of them. And anything connected to the investigation of that would have to be carefully analyzed and studied. Again, it is not credible to think that this information would not be of interest that did we see, did we see this translucent glowing object under the water? Did we shine a light on an object that appeared to evade our beam? I think this is a prime interest to any organization that's in charge of, you know, such expensive, incredible pieces of equipment as a nuclear submarine. So again, we have to say it is not a credible statement that there is no data here. There's data. And it's amatter of where to find it. And not just the Glover PRODUCT, not just the USS Scorpion PRODUCT, all of the events that I mentioned here and countless others that have occurred within the history of the US Navy ORG, or again, not to just single them out the army, the Air Force, the Coast Guard. I did a Coast Guard case here on this channel a couple of weeks ago. That was quite, quite fascinating indeed. So I mean, is anyone really supposed to believe that the US Navy Command ORG is that blaze abouttheir ultra-expentive and powerful, powerful ships, that that they take an exceptional. Amount of pride in that they are literally to them, the most important objects in the world. What is more important to Navy Command ORG than its ships? So again, it is not remotely credible that there is no data on these types of events. That's the Navy. We have an Air Force. We have an Army. We have a Coast Guard. We've got others. I will be coming back with accounts from those services in the future, but I still certainly have many more with the Navy that I will be sharing with you.Meanwhile, do not be lulled by the tones of the Pentagon ORG into thinking that they are honest players in this drama. They may feel that they have very good reasons to hold back on UAP information from you. But the fact is, they are holding very much information back. That's the bottom line there. If you like this video, please as always help me out like the video share it if you wish. If you think it's worth sharing, subscribe to my channel here if you haven't already done so. I'm very grateful forthat support. And if you really like what I do, by all means, check out what I've got at Richard Dolan members.com ORG. I do this type of work on check out what I've got at Richard Dolanmembers.com. I do this type of work on that website all the time also. And that's it again. Thank you for being here with me. And in the meantime, let's keep fighting the good fight.Later. On over 36 million flights, there were 81 aviation accidents in that year. For the previous five years before that, you know, it's going back about a decade, but still an average of 86 accidents per year. That's one accident for every 2.4 million flights, but also one accident for every four days or so. So you know, really what I guess I'm saying here is it kind of depends on the volume of traffic. And one thing that we actually do not know is how much UFO volume, UAP volume, there actually is.We don't really have a handle on this. This is something that I have been trying to understand for quite a while, trying to, come up with some sort of estimate of how much activity is actually going on in our skies, in our oceans, in our atmosphere, beyond. We don't know. My suspicion has been for some time that it's actually much, much more than we suspect. I won't go into all the reasons for that here. Again, I've done it before.We can revisit it, but I will just suffice to say that I think there is quite a lot of activity going on. And you know, a couple of crashes, you're werefos here and there, really not a shocking thing when you really get down to it. Advanced technology does not mean you are omnipotent. It doesn't mean you are all knowing.You can still make mistakes. Things can still go wrong. Almost 20 years ago, I had a conversation with this man. This was astronaut Edgar Mitchell of Apollo 14 PRODUCT. I met Edgar in person for the first time at this particular where this photograph is taken. That's Roswell in New Mexico in July of 2004.And it's an interesting thing. Look how I look young and he's alive. So there's 20 years go by there. We went into, there's a door right behind Dr. Mitchell PERSON, if you see it in that picture. There. And I actually went into that room after this photograph was takenand I spoke with him. This is before I knew anything about the meeting of Eric Davis PERSON with Admiral Thomas Wilson. The infamous Davis Wilson notes, I did not know about them in 2004. However, I spoke to Dr. Mitchell PERSON in that room right behind him there and he told me quite. Explicitly about his knowledge from two specific sources he said of the reality of the acquisition of alien bodies, alien technology and the fact that these were being studied in deep secrecy. He did not, we didn't get into Davis Wilson ORG. That was something I learned abouttwo years later, two years later, two years later, late. Zero six. So but nonetheless, he made it, it was a very explicit statement that he made to me and. It had a very big impact on me. I will just point out the research of this man here. I've spoken about him countless times over the course of my career. This is Leonard Stringfield PERSON. He's a true OG and UFO research, and especially he is the original great crash retrieval researcher. More than standing freedman, more than anybody Leonard Stringfield is the guy who really broke. This opened about 50 years ago.That book, the picture there, it's called Situation Red. That was the book in the late 70s that he mentioned some crash retrieval cases and out. Of the woodwork, people started coming to Leonard Stringfield PERSON. He collected a tremendous number of stories from a wide range of sources. Again, this is something I've talked about right here in this channel many times, including a couple of episodes with my wife, Tracy PERSON, when we did intelligent disclosure.Remember that? I've talked about this many times on my website also at Richard Allen ORG members. One of his important cases, I would say, was the man he referred to as Dr. X. This was a gentleman that Stringfield really developed a very good relationship with and Rupport with Met in person on a number of occasions. Suffice to say, Stringfield, who was a very careful researcher in my view, became quite. Persuaded that this man was telling him the absolutetruth. This doctor just said, look, I autopsied and tested alien bodies. He worked at a medical facility somewhere in the eastern US GPE. Stringfield never gave up that information, although he did meet with this doctor where. The man worked. Doctors said, look, based on the information, you're talking about beings that are four. Feet tall.They weigh about 40 pounds, big heads. They got a brow ridge, more of a brow ridge than what humans have. Large eyes, holes for ears, and on and on. Very similar to what you get with descriptions of grey aliens. He mentioned no reproductive organs. They seemed clone-like. Maybe they are like androids. There was another source that came. By the way, that doctor, I'll just point out, talking with Stringfield for a period of time and then suddenlystopped dead in his tracks. He said, I've just had my knuckles smacked by my people. I'm not allowed to talk to you anymore. Sorry. That was the end of him. He actually was no more testimony from that man. One of Stringfield sources talked about something called the infamous blue room. You hear a lot about this in UFO crash, retrieval, law, and testimony. What is the blue room? In the case that Stringfield was given, this is a room that was literally fully painted. In blue.The impression you get when you read the account is it's to kind of identify all of the alien artifacts that are in this room. Anything that's not blue? Bingo, alien artifact. This is a source that Stringfield felt was a very reliable source. That's how he characterized this individual who was brought was a very reliable source. That's how he characterized thisindividual who was brought, actually the reliable source, told Stringfield of a close colleague of his. So it's third hand or second hand who's brought to a very heavily secured facility, large. Hangar, everything's blue inside, tables, shelves, everything holding thousands, he said. Thousands of artifacts. These artifacts were primarily not recognizable to this witness. Here's a quote from it. They were told that they were to study each object and determine its purpose operating. Parameters, and whether or not it could be duplicated. There's a lot more to that. By the way, if you're interested inStringfield's stories, you can go pick up about 100 bucks. On Amazon ORG, but you can actually get his seven collected crash retrieval updates. A lot of money doesn't exist electronically. It's all paperback, but it's some of the most significant reading in the UFO field that I can think of. Let me just continue with some more of Stringfield's accounts, which when you really think about it, how different are they from the testimony that's coming to the Inspector General's office, and the Pentagon and so forth. Stringfield vetted those guys the best he could. They are tellinghim basically the same types of stories that are coming through here. Here's another one. Person being led. I think this might be the same one of the blue room, actually. So I'll just continue this. We're shown for large aquariums. This is like right out of an X- WORK_OF_ARTFiles episode except Stringfield's writing about this long. Before there was an X-Files for large aquariums filled with a pink solution, each containing. A small body of a grey skin, oversized cranium, huge eyes, no hair. We're talking grey aliens in tanks.He said pieces of metal were in the back of the room from slivers to large twisted chunks. Presumably crash wreckage. There was a curator here who led this whole tour of this soldier and his colleagues and. He just related then at that time the story of the Roswell Crash EVENT, which at this time. That was not a story that was widely out there.I had some bullets here. You can screenshot this. If you wish, a number of other Stringfield accounts. Even these are a sliver of what Leonard Stringfield collected over about 25 years from the late 70s until his death in 1994. He learned of a retrieval of a UFO craft in 1957. Alien bodies essentially recovered with great difficulty.He was told that they got these bodies. Another witness. It's a dramatic one, in my opinion, who saw nine alien bodies at Wright-Patterson Air Force FAC. Base in 1966. He said they were four feet tall. He was told they were 30 bodies in total at the base at that time at Wrightpat in 1966. 30 alien bodies at that time. He was told that a craft was at the base and said atcertain military bases, there are mobile units in a constant ready state to recover downed UFOs. Stringfield interviewed a radar specialist at Fort Monmouth, New Jersey GPE, who was stationed at Fort Monmouth back in 1953. Stringfield met him about 25 years later. This is an original kind of alien autopsy video claim, except again, this is long before. Ray Santillis thing came out in the 1990s.This guy told Stringfield, I was brought into this military theatre. No one briefed me. I got no information at all. I was shown a film of a crash UFO in some kind of desert. I saw the interior of the craft and there were dead aliens inside a tent. Lights go on. We're all told to leave. No explanation. He said a couple about a week or two later, an intelligence officer on the base said, Hey, that film you saw, forget it. It was a hoax. He said, I've been wondering what the hell that's all been about ever since. I've always feltthat that was a test. I think this guy maybe failed the test. Maybe he didn't react the right way. Maybe he told someone. Maybe who knows? If you're looking for applicants for a crash retrieval program, wouldn't that be a very logical thing you do?You show them something that's deniable and you gauge their reaction. This is after all a pretty dramatic subject and you really want to know who you're dealing. With. It's a theory. Stringfield had a bunch of other stories that are just equally incredible. Someone else who saw seven alien bodies a right pad in the 60s.And on and on, a former intelligence officer who in 1948 said, I saw a top secret manuscript about a UFO crash in New Mexico GPE dealing with craft and bodies. Maybe that was about Roswell GPE. Maybe that was about Aztec NORP. Who knows?This last bullet I've just got here. I'll just read. This was a lieutenant colonel who told Stringfield of what he said was intimate knowledge, intimate, knowledge of underground installations. And he specifically cited Fort Hood in Texas GPE on this matter. And other facilities he said that had squadrons of unmarked basically black helicopters thatwould be dispatched to areas of UFO activity, including he said airlift operations. Sounds a lot like what we're now calling Operation Zodiac EVENT, which has been discussed a little. Bit more and more recently in this field, including by myself. I know Linda Moulton Howt did a thing on Zodiac about a month ago. Very nicely done. Zodiac ORG I think is legit.I think it was the name of the, let's just say, the official crash retrieval program. You know, people have talked about MJ12 for years. I don't think they've been talking about Zodiac ORG until very recently. And I do think that this is right on. I'll just mention here, Senator, late Senator Barry Goldwater of Arizona GPE, very well known. Man historically.In addition, by the way, to being a member of the U.S. Senate, Barry Goldwater was a general in the U.S. Air Force Reserve ORG. And he was a very close friend of Air Force General Curtis LeMay PERSON. Curtis LeMay, who's one of the most famous generals in Air Force history. One on that cigar all the time was Chief of Staff of the U.S. Air Force and was tight with Goldwater PERSON. Goldwater was into the UFO subject. Looks like he always was. And at one time he famously asked Lamee about Wright Patterson. And I think he mentioned the Blue Room as well,try to get access to it. And Goldwater PERSON many times said this is the only time in my long friendship with General. La May PERSON that he cussed me out and said, don't ever discuss that topic with me again. You understand, don't ever bring that up again. Goldwater PERSON talked about this quite a few times. And famously, several times, actually, he answered requests from constituents about interested in information about the UFO subject, about crash retrieval, and all of that. In one letter, this is one statement he made.He says, look, look, look, essentially, yes, a lot has come out lately through freedom. Of information at that time in the late 70s, early 80s. F-O-I-A was kind of a new thing. And a lot of information had come out. But he said, despite all of that, this thing has gotten so highly classified, it is just impossible to get anything on it. That was Barry Goldwater PERSON. We can go on. I will go on in the future.There is much, much more to be said about UAP, UFO, crash, retrieval. But what I'm going to say to you here is don't be shocked by these revelations. This is actually old news for researchers who have been looking at this subject with any level of seriousness over, you know, however many years we've been doing it. This is important. This is serious, and it's one of these things that I'll just tell you. This is my takeaway here.What is the reality? The alleged current leaks are consistent with historical testimony, at least as far as we can see so far. All right, so we don't have, it's true. Like all we have is Grusha PERSON's statement, which didn't have as much detail as we would like. We gave these reasons for that, and now we have these claims of 30 or more witnesses.And yes, they are just claims, but from what it's looking like so far, these seem consistent with what we have gotten historically up until now. And I'm just going to say, based on all of my study of the, all of the data of what we can call you we foes. Someone one or something else is here. Someone's that's not supposed to be here. They are here. This is being denied by our authorities, whoever these beings are, whoever these intelligences. Ah, they have radically advanced technology that is of immense value. Never forget, it's not just, it's not just a technology. It's what isworth. Everything's got a dollar value, everything's got a money value. The super advanced technology that we are, obviously people are looking at it every single. Day? So maybe I can instantly accelerate, do right angle turns. I'm looking at reports on a practically daily basis these days that are just mind-blowing. Mind-blowing stuff.All right, that's of immense value. Anything that can do these things, trans-medium objects that can enter or leave or merge from. Bodies of water and act in incredible performance ways like that, that's of immense value. So don't ever forget that. And also don't forget the fact that what these beings are doing, they are all around the world. They are operating in every part of the world that I can imagine.They must have an advanced infrastructure whereby what they are doing is also important. To them. This matters. They are operating everywhere. This must be important for them. And we as a society and as a UAP ORG community, we have to be asking questions like what does.This mean? And the last few things I'll just say here, our authorities, certainly based on the historical testimony and now what we're hearing today have possession of some of that tech and some of those bodies or some of those biologics, if you want to call it that, and all of this is being kept secret from us. We are being kept in the dark. We're like, you know, this whole world is going on around us and we're sitting tied to a little chair with blindfold on.Not able to see what's happening around us. But that's our reality. That's what's going on here. So don't be shocked. Don't be too shocked by ongoing revelations concerning these UFO crash retrievals, these UAP crash retrievals. You want to call it UFO? You want to call it UAP?Doesn't matter to me. We're acquiring them and our authorities have them. And you know, I'm just going to say this again before I wrap it up. This is going to be a shorter than usual program. There's a red line of UFO disclosure. This is the red line crash retrievals.This is the line that must not be crossed by the authorities. Why? It's obvious. It's one thing to say, oh, yes, there's something out there. We're going to figure this out. We're looking at this just like you're looking at. It's a totally different thing to then say, oh, yes, well, in fact, we've had their technology.That means we've been lying to you and we have been engaged in a conspiracy of silence. That's what that means. And I'm not going to tire of saying this because we're being told all the time you are not. Supposed to believe in conspiracy theories. Well, what is bigger than the UFO cover up in terms of conspiracy theories? You tell me this is the biggest of them all.It's the one that people have been talking about for generations. It's the one that won't go away. It's bigger than the 9 to 11 theory. It's bigger than JFK PERSON. Yeah, it's bigger than both of those aliens, real cover-up bodies, technology. Are you kidding me? There's nothing bigger. And so to admit that this is real, look, that's a serious credibility problem. And this is why I am quite, I don't like to make predictions, but I'm going to make this. One. Yes, we've had, there's amendments now in the current NDAA that if it's passed, it probably will be passed that will, in theory, mandate proper reporting by contractors to the US GPE.Government of alien tech and all that stuff. Yeah, yeah. The image is all in there. Yeah, they put in this JFK PERSON assassination, like provision that's supposedly going to. Release UFO, UAP information. Well well you study the JFK PERSON assassination you know how effective that's going to be but the point is what's going to be the case after a full year of this my prediction is it's not going to be a breakthrough I mean I would like to see a breakthrough. I honestly would.I just don't believe it's likely. Why there is too much for the establishment to lose. This is not, this is a no-win thing for them. The only way they're going to get through this is they must be fully confident, like, 100% confident that they have got this narrative. And they have also got the tools of repression in place to a prevent, you know, serious alternative. Narratives from getting out there and then be fromactually punitively clamping down to people who go beyond what they want them to go beyond. Maybe they're getting close to that. Maybe they are. I don't feel that we're there yet. I think that there's still the free people of this world still have enough wiggle room right now. And I think it would be a very difficult thing for the US GPE government to acknowledge that. They actually have been complicit in hiding alien bodies and alien technology. Because that just opens up a whole can of worms that is not predictable in how the outcome is going to turn out. So I just, I don't see an outcome in which they're going to willingly do this. And by the way, if you look at all of the statements, all of the behaviours of the established. All the established statements, none of them give this subject to the kind of credence that, can you and students know that it deserves, they just don't? Even now, you know, in this last article, the IG stated, we're not really looking into.These claims, essentially saying we don't think they're important. We don't think that they are credible. And you know, you know, we saw the NASA ORG study that came out recently, same kind of attitude. It's like, yeah, it doesn't look like there's anything really outrageous. I will be talking at some point soon, maybe on my website, maybe hear about a recent study. By Rand Corporation ORG, Rand, which is always involved in doing work for the national security. State, Rand, which a couple of years ago,I talked about this, did a study with Google ORG's Jigsaw unit to clamp down on conspiracy theories online. Yeah, that Rand, well, they just did a study on analyzing the UFO, UAP data at the National. ORG UFO Reporting Center. One of my favorite websites, I go to there all the time. And they did a fairly detailed study of it. And I'll just say very briefly, there's some interesting things that they did there. They looked at kind of geographic distribution of 100,000 UFO reports on that site.Kind of interesting. Not easy to do. You got to go one at a time with those things. But also, they went out of their way to try to disable conspiracy theories. They went out of their way to say, well, it looks like a lot of these UAP sightings take place over areas of military airspace. Kind of sly hinting that a lot ofUFO reports are actually military craft. I'm sure some are. But that doesn't tell us anything. I mean, you go through the National UFO Reporting Center ORG sightings and there's not a chance. In hell that you're going to find most of them explainable as military aircraft. Sorry. The devil's in the details, you got to read the specific cases.So there's a bit of, you know, the RAN report was essentially saying, well, we're not trying to explain this a way or explain it one way or the other. But yeah, they kind of were. And then the last thing in that RAN LAW recommendation, which is the one that you should be concerned about, is that they want the US GPE government to improve UAP reporting and kind of both. Coming into them and going out to the public. They want the US GPE government.I mean, this was how they basically put it in my opinion. And any time you're going to have the US GPE government get involved in this in official narratives, you better be prepared for disinformation. That's where the real disinfo comes in. Not from private groups. It's from the state. Of course it is. We're living in the midst of a global revolution. Look around you. It's going on every way you look. Creative control isabsolutely essential. And that clearly seems to be including the UFO subject. Well, and then I'm going to wrap it up here. A little shorter than normal. If you like what I do here, hey, look, like the video, help me out with the algorithms. You know what to do with notifications so you don't miss new episodes. Subscribe to this channel. Doesn't cost you anything.If you really support what I do, go to my website, ricadulam ORG members.com. There's members content and there's free content there too. I'm very busy there every week doing what I can to shed as much light on this challenging. Difficult, demanding, but ever so important subject. It gets relegated to the fringe all too often. And you know, we're starting to see some changes. That's good. That's a long way to go. And those of us who care need to defend this subject because that's what it deserves. It needs people to defend it. And that includes me and that includes you.On that note, I will leave you. Have fun unraveling the truth and don't forget to click on those links. My name is Brandon PERSON your AI host.

Speaker 27116.62s - 7118.72s

Please don't forget to click on the links below.

Speaker 17119.48s - 7122.56s

I hope you're ready for a really big adventure because I am.

Speaker 27123.56s - 11208.52s

Ah, here we go. Right, hopefully. Technology is my friend, it isn't usually. Okay, darker side of uphology. I'm going to give you the most amazing talk I've ever done. So let's get in there.The universe, the galaxies, the planets, everything. You've got to remember that they're all basically made of the same stuff. Okay, so let's start off on a level playing field. Here we go. You will no doubt recognize some of the alchemists among you. The symbols for fire, water, earth and air.And the last one to go up will be spirit because obviously everything is intrinsically alive. Now then, somebody said to me, you know, spacecraft crashes and it crashes into our dimension. Let's analyze it and find out what it is. Okay, well, supposing you get something you can't analyze because you don't know what. It is. Problem because we don't have anything there that we can recognize. However, when you're dealing with things like this, you do. You do have things you can recognize. And the question is, if these things are in our dimension, are they not going to be made?Out of the same thing, things, plural as our dimension? And the answer is yes, of course they are. So when I get into stuff to do with the UFO debris, which I'm going to do in a bit, it's, you know, you expect to find something in there that you're going to recognize because it's, you know, it's in our world. It's in our dimension. So in keeping with the theme of this year's awakening, what I'm hoping to do here is literally. By the end of the talk, blow the lid off reality. That's the plan.Okay, that's what I'm going to do. So prepare to fall right down the bottom of the rabbit hole, as long as I don't drop off. The edge of here because it's quite a long way down there. Okay, part one. So I'm going to, I'm going to crack on with 40 years since Impact, Europe LOC's Roswell. Okay, I'm going to try and bring you up to date with actual physical UFO debris. That's where we're going with this.So right at the beginning, start at the beginning, let's start the story off. Jack Call Gary Rowe back in the 1980s, in the January of 1983 gets this. Now you guys will probably remember the days before technology, you know, we didn't have. Laptops, we didn't have mobile phones, we didn't have anything like that. So if you wanted to keep in touch with what was going on, you would subscribe to, essentially, to a news clipping agency. And what the news clipping agency would do is they would send you anything they thought wasrelevant. So the first thing that Gary gets at the beginning of 1983 is this newspaper article. And he looks at it and he goes, oh, I'm on a minute. That's North Wales GPE. Now Gary lives in North Wales GPE and at this point he's running the UFO community, the UFO. Recovery and research people. Anyway, he's running this community and he looks at this newspaper article and he goes, Oh, there's a guy in here called, Evans PERSON, and I know who, well, he's down here, I bearis.Within this little village called Clinilla and he's a farmer who will Evans PERSON. So Gary PERSON goes, I don't know how to phone him. So he rings ooh, well, and he says, what's going on? What's about this UFO crash thing? And ooh, whoa, you need to come down and see this and you're not going to believe what's happened.The gist of the story, because I covered it for this. If you find this, by the way, you're really lucky. The little chap out there, shout out to Keith PERSON. I know you're out there somewhere. Managed to get a copy of this from America GPE, who was released in 2008. If you get all of this, this is the beginning of the story because Garybrought me in as a documentary maker to try and cover what he then uncovered and that's where I'm going. To tell you the story, okay? He brought me in to cover it and that's the beginning really of the story, Europe's Roswell. So he brings me in and he says, this is a story that Uwell LOC is giving, that's something, and he doesn't know what, has scattered his fields with debris. Now then, I'll give you a couple of bits of background here because you're going to need. Them. A lot of things are frequently seen coming up out of Cardigan Bay LOC,okay? Things lights and ships and crafts and all sorts of stuff come out of the bay. To the point where the local R&LI ORG, the local lifeboat station, has the phone number of the nearest military RAF ORG station and every time something comes up, they just ring them. Up and he's going, oh yes, we've got another light coming up out of Cardigan Bay LOC. Now round about this time, which is the beginning of 1983, there were a lot of lights, a lot. Of things seen coming out of Cardigan Bay LOC, which is significant in relation to where.The crash takes place, okay. There's lots of stuff whizzing around. I think I covered it in interviews. It's like it's the North Wales GPE triangle. Basically, you can draw lines straight up the coast along the Mersey Valley LOC and then back. Down again to join with here.You've got this big triangle takes in Snowdonia and most of North Wales GPE and that's the area. Where a lot of these sightings are happening because things are zipping up the valleys. Below the radar. Anyway, in this particular occasion, things don't go at all well. Because when Gary gets to Orwell's farm, Orwell says, well, he said, we've got a problem. Here.He said, because I phoned the local police at the time of the incident beginning of January. And the police evidently contacted the RAF ORG and we had a clean-up team that turned up. In loads of vehicles with lights and they worked right through the night and they cleared everything. But I had four fields. Now, you guys probably know that fields in whales are pretty big. He said we had four fields and they were covered, absolutely covered in pieces of metal, tinfoil. Little bits of things thatlook like girders, all kind of debris. These guys who turn out then spent all night clearing up. So, Orwell goes to bed, has to go up the next day with his sheep and tend to his lambs and what have you and he gets up and it's gone. So, by the time Gary gets there, Orwell's like, well, I don't think you're going to. Find anything. So, they search the four fields and Gary PERSON notices that the tops of the trees in the woods next.Door, they've been cut away quite significantly to the width of about 20, 25 feet. So, he said, right, clearly what's happened here is something's come flying in and it's took the top off the trees, boom, fly that and then catapulted all this debris into the fields. That's basically what's happened. And of course, the military have cleaned it all up and Gary PERSON's like, well, they're not. Going to get it all. Middle of the night, wandering through a woodland.No, they won't find all the bits. So, Gary piles into the woods and he goes looking for this debris and he gets about six. Pieces, two pieces of foil and four pieces of debris. Okay, some of this debris is flat, some of it's got hexagons on it. Okay. So, he's recovered something, he's got something. So, he says to Orwell, he says, well, can we come back and try again? Oh, it's like, yeah, you can come back.So, they come back. They find anything on the second visit. So he says to Orwell, he says, I'll bring some metal detectors next time. So at this point, you head into the end of February. Anyway, he gets the phone call of the world and he says, who will say, you're not going. To believe this. They're taking the forest away.So, Gary PERSON's like, they're removing the woods. And he's like, yes, they're literally, they're in now with the diggers, the woodland people. Forestry commission, and they're taking the woods away. So, Gary PERSON's like, OK. So, he phones the Woodland Commission, Gary PERSON does, and he speaks to this guy on the other. And... And he says, what are you doing? He says, oh, it's wind damage. We're taking it away because of wind damage. And Gary PERSON's like, do you normallytake the woods away for wind damage? And the guy on the other end is basically like, no, but in this particular case, we are. Yeah, that was our response. So Gary PERSON's like, yeah, right, okay. Clearly, the woodland people are saying, you know, they've been in order to do this. So actually, the metal detecting thing never happened and they never went back. But you're all set there now thinking they got the debris. Absolutely damn right they did.So, here we go. Let's jump in. I've only got a few of the fragments here, but they're full color. You'll be able to see them on a big screen. So it's a little bit more stunning as it were than they appear in the book. And here they are. These are the fragments. That's that particular fragments interesting because you can see it's just green on one. Side and grey on the other.Now that leads to the interesting conclusion because we all concluded that this stuff's. As you can see it's just green on one. Side and grey on the other. Now that leads to the interesting conclusion because we all concluded that this stuff's all the same. We thought it's all the same. Probably all the same kind of metal. Then we had a look at the other couple of fragments that are in this case. I wonder if I can do this.No, I can't use the laser. We can see here there's a big piece, which is in the case, and two little pieces. So let's have a look at these little pieces. This is the foil. It's like honeycomb foil. So that's fragment number two. Number three is another piece of foil. Now I've got to say it's really interesting. This is where something that we guessed it actually became reality because we called it. Europe's Roswell. And about three or four days before the book went into print, some guy out therein Corona. In New Mexico said, oh, it's not metal he took on the Roswell GPE crash. I've got a piece of metal. And he sent us the photo and it's a piece of that. That's what it looks like. It's a smaller piece of that off the crash site at Roswell GPE. And we knew the little beads are metal because back in the 1990s, National Geographic ORG scent. Some archaeology set on to Roswell GPE.And they got these little beads of odd metal. And that's all these metal things are described as. So we suspected there was a connection. The other connection, because I'm not going to go into connections, they're all in the book. Europe's Roswell 40 years since impact. But the rest of the connections, basically, if you canimagine the military, I've got a book on their shelf. And it's this big green book and down the spine. It says, in the event of a UFO crash, and they reach for this book, and it's the same. Playbook every time they do the same things every time. So that's why we call this Europe's Roswell GPE, because basically what story of Roswell, you? No, one farmer, one newspaper article, one recovery team, loads of metal disappears. Some fragments turn up, you know, so on and so on, everything, all except for the big. Flying disc with the green guys hanging out, we didn't have that.But that's actually more mysterious. I'll throw it in here. You imagine four fields covered in debris, and whatever it was, the craft, the engines. The cockpit, the pilots, the weather, could still fly off, gone, disappeared. And yet it's just lost. Probably the entire of its undercarriage, gone, everything, all the underside of its. Completely smashed a bit, but it canstill fly off. That points more towards something that's a little bit alien. Okay, looking at the big bits, because there's a huge piece of this, this is a huge piece. It's quite big. It's about some of our laptop screen. You can attack it with a cutter, you can attack it with a drill, you can stamp on it, it doesn't. Change shape, it just bounces back. If you want to take a piece off it, you get a pair of pliers and you wiggle it very carefully. And eventually it snaps. Now then, that leads us to the conclusion, this stuff does not like being attacked.When you attack it and you put pressure on it and you really, you know, it pushes back. It pushes back, so you can't really just cut it up. You have to, you know, do it slowly. So we've got them, we've got the pieces. So there you go, exclusively in full color on a big screen. We have these bits.Remember what I said at the beginning, if you know something's in this dimension, chances. Are it physically exists, it's here, you know? Well, we've actually succeeded in getting the evidence. Okay. My publisher is great, I mean, Philip Mantel's fab, he's been in the uphology for many years. Probably 30, 40 years now. And he said, do you think it's time we did something about this? I also had a friend who I requested did the same thing. By the time we finished, we got four of these requests into various different places.The one to the police was a waste of time because they just referred us to the military. The first one that we put into the military, that a friend of mine put in, nah, sorry. Don't have any information, never heard of it at all. And that's where we were when I put this together until about a week ago. And the last two came in. Now, this is a lesson in how people in the Secret Services ORG work, okay?This is a really good lesson because one of them came back and it came back from one. Of the Air Force bases and they just said, nah, it wasn't one of ours, we don't know. Anything about it at all, but the last request went into Q in London, you know? Freedom of Information Act, Main Records Office ORG. And basically they wrote back and they went, we can't tell you anything because it's under. The 70 years restriction because we can't name the people involved.So we're sat like, oh, there were people involved with it. Okay, and we can't tell you what the incident was either. Oh, right, okay. So not only was there an incident, but there's an incident where people were involved because that's what they've just told us. Yes, we've got a record of this.So I can now categorically say exclusively because I haven't even written this up anywhere. That not only did the incident actually take place because they've accidentally told us. That, but people, people were involved. So the police saw that, you know, military or whoever it was in that recovery crew were. Definitely on site. So we've confirmed two very important factors there. Not only is this real, they're starting toown up to it, but people were involved. So there you go, exclusively, really important, super, super-duper important piece of information. You're all going to say, well, why don't you get it tested? So we did. We did. Right. That's obviously the next step. There's a lovely story involved here because Gary's, you know, held on to the medal all these years. And I've got to say, he doesn't keep it to his house. He keeps it in storage. And he did, he did have a visit from the men in black.Now that's not in the documentary because when we stopped the cameras, Gary PERSON took me. On one side and he said, there is a darker side to this. He said, when whoever will saw these recovery people, he said, there were police and policemen. In officers' gear. And he said, there were Air Force and there were Air Force officers. And he said, and they were all being ordered around by guys in suits. They were the ones in charge of the situation. And February, Gary PERSON gets a knock on the door. And he goes to answer his door. His doors made a glass.And he said, you could see these two guys outside. He said, and they're black. Two black outlines. He said, so he knew what was coming. So he opened the door and sure enough, exactly like you see in men in black, you know, black. Suits, hats, ties, in men in black, you know, black. Suits, hats, ties, incomprehensible passes, you know, and Gary PERSON looks down the close line. There's two SUVs parked in his close with the windows blacked out and no number plates. And these guys basically go, can we have our material back, please?And Gary PERSON goes, no. Yes, good old Gary. They said, oh, why can't we have our material back, please? And Gary goes, no. Yes, good old Gary. They said, oh, why can't we have our material back? He said, well, I've taken one of these pieces. That's why it's not in the photographs. He said, I've taken one of these pieces and I've broken it up. He said into about 100 little fragments and he said, and I put them in key rings and I've sent them to everybody I know that has any connection to the media. And he said, if you guys knock on my front door again, I'm going to phone them all up andtell them to release the pieces to the media. So these men in black literally just dut the hats off. They went and drove out of the clothes. And that was it. They've never been seen since. But there are a couple of important factors that we draw from that as well. First of all, they must have known that somebody found something in the forest.Otherwise, they wouldn't know that anyone had any pieces and why would you remove the woods? And the second thing is more sinister than you where he lived because he went and visited. Him. So these guys are out there. Okay, they're definitely out there. No doubt about it.So I can say Gary PERSON, very protective, incredibly, incredibly protective of his material. So Philip Mantle PERSON, the publisher, Flying Disc Press ORG, give him a plug because he's asked. Us all too. I mean, five authors on Flying Disc are up here today. Basically, he phoned me up and he said, do you think Gary PERSON had sent us some of this material? And I'm like, no. No, he protects this with his life, you know. And Philip's like, well, do you know, I'll send him an email and see what he's going to.Do. So he sends him an email without any of the word about three or four days later. He gets the jiffy bag through the post. You know, sends it by a post. And there it is. There's the samples ready for analysis.So right, we're off. Game on. Let's do this. Now then, it's worth saying that obviously the obvious thing is why didn't we get an analysis at the time? Well, Gary PERSON did because Gary has friends in the aviation industry. He had a couple of ladies that built planes and stuff. So he took it tothen. They'd never seen anything like it. He had a couple of friends that, you know, worked on military aircraft and they looked at it back in 1980s. This is an age said, no, we don't really know what it is either. Well, in this country, if you want to know what something is, you go to British Aerospace. Because they are the big boys. So he took the stuff to British Aerospace ORG and they said, well, it's going to cost us about six grand maybe to analyze this. It's beyond our ability to do this off the record. You know, we can't just do this privately. They said, but we will give you an opinion.They sent him about 12 pages of opinion and their opinion was its gyralamine. Now gyralamine is an aluminium alloy. There's about 200 different kinds of it and it's a trade name. So it's like saying, oh, it's, you know, McDonald's or it's Coca-Cola ORG or whatever it's. Giralamine. And that's been around in airships since the First World War EVENT. So it's been around a long time.Do you think they're telling the truth? Okay, maybe, maybe not. Well, that was the British analysis. That was the first, the first proper analysis. No, Philip doesn't do it like that. So what he does, he sends off two of these samples. As it turns out, he sent one of the hexagon ones, the top ones, and he sent this flat. One at the bottom.He sent one to Australia and he sent the other one to America GPE. And he didn't tell the labs that he'd done this. So there's no information exchange whatsoever between the labs. And we get the one back from Australia GPE now. This is interesting because this kind of speaks to possible cover up. And the one comes back from Australia GPE now. This is interesting because this kind of speaks to possible cover up. And the one comes back from Australia GPE. So we'll start with that one. Here we go. They had noproblem at all cutting their sample up. So they chopped it up into different bits like this. Probably the most significant one on there, actually, is bottom left. Because the bottom left one basically shows you how this material has been created because it's got inclusions in it. And again, the middle one on this side of the screen nearest to me, that middle one, that's got a lot of bubbles in it. So basically they came back with their report and they said, this is what we think it is.Okay, it's coming back. Most of it's aluminium. Okay, so hats off to British Aerospace ORG. They got the aluminium bit, right? With a bit of titanium in it, there's graphite epoxylaminate, so basically resin, some kind. Of resin.They didn't have any ink impurities. And then they came out with this. American cyanamide FM 123, which is glue. Okay, that's what they thought the glue was. And then some kind of silicon cured resin films. So me and Philip looked at that and we thought, oh, that's done it. American NORP glue. That's just about sunk it.That's the end of that, you know. Which is kind of what everybody expected was going to happen. You know, yeah, maybe this is going to turn out to be made down here. So we were miserable for a couple of days and a couple of days later, I'll show you this. First of all, this is where this is for the chemists among you. Because remember what I said at the beginning, everything's made of something if it's here.That's what it's made of. That's where your components are on the periodic table. So we were a bit disappointed to find that out, but then we got the one from America GPE. Right, what's interesting about those two photographs is the Australian NORP said there was. No heat damage. Well, that top one there clearly shows heat damage.And the bottom one is not a mistake. They sent us that photograph and I'm looking at it and I'm like, it's all over the place. It's pixelated. And basically they said, that's what happens when you put this material under an electron. Microscope. For some reason the material pushes back. So all we're getting is distortion. That is a distorted photograph of this particular piece of metal. Which remember, we assumed it was all the same. So at this pointwe didn't know that any different. Then we get this. This is a completely different kettle of fish. Okay, completely different kettle of fish. Now then what you got to bear in mind straight away is that these are the American NORPs. So if there's American glue, they're going to know that the glue is American NORP. And clearly it's not American glue. So I think that was either an intent to cover up or it was a mistake in the analysis. I'm going to give you opinions by the way that are not in the book. This is not in print. I'm going to give you the proper version because that's what Steve PERSON said.Let rip. Let's dance the coat. Thank you very much. Thank you very much. I'm the Santa Claus of Apology. But the biggest one on there is Lantharnum. Good grief. Lantium.That's like, whoa, what? 94.6% Lantium. What on earth is Lantium? But anyway, I scurried off and did what you guys would do, Wikipedia ORG. What's Lantium? Where does that come from?Well, apparently it's the 27th most common material on Earth LOC. So it's up there with things like slate and mud. It's everywhere. It's in everything. But it's also in the upper atmosphere and meteorites and asteroids and pretty much every planet in the galaxy. And what I said at the beginning about looking for material that we can recognize, but this is material being used in a way that we've never seen before. So it's not about looking for some kind of weird biological entity that suddenly morphs into the shape of a spaceship. And when you get itunder a microscope, you don't know what the hell it is. And don't forget all that. That's science fiction. It's about somebody doing something with what we've got in a completely different way. To anything that we think about. We would never think of doing this. And Lantium is important because it's so common that it costs, well, probably millions of dollars to extract it. It's really difficult to get Lantium.It's really, really hard to get it. So the first thing that struck me when I saw that was, okay, wait a minute, this covered for sheep fields. And some of these sheets of metal are two meters square plus, that's for the old school, it's about six foot. Six foot square sheets of lantium. So one sheet of lantium is going to cost you more than the entire space program to. Extract one sheet of it.And it's covering four fields. Four fields. What the hell is this thing? You know? So I'll show you this one. This is so weird.It's such a bizarre material. It's only extra bit that they've had to add on. You know the bit that since we were all at school, you know, they've increased. You've got it, you've increased the periodic table. So they've had to put an extra bit on it. The lanthinamide, which is this bottom line, that's lanthium.So it's a relatively, relatively scarce and recent thing. It's known as an exotic metal. It's a rare earth metal. And then you get the big kicker. Here's the big kicker. You're over for the punch line.What the hell was this doing on planet Earth in 1983? Doesn't matter if the Australians NORP found aluminium foam, you know, which is what they found. They found this reactive stuff because that didn't exist in 1983. And not only did it not exist, but if you think about it logically, if it crashed in. The January of 1983, it takes a couple of years to develop something that can fly. And clearly they'd have been developing this since the end of the 1970s.You know, for years, five years, six years. No, this was flying. This was in the air, actually up there in 1983. At which point your head kind of goes, what, where's this coming from? Where on earth is this coming from? What is it?So to speculate a bit and kick the kin around a little bit, you know, is it the same stuff? That came down in Roswell, 1947. You know, of the Americans NORP been mocking about with this all that time? Mm-mm, okay. Well, 1983. That's 40 years plus ago. But where are we now? Okay, wow, that's really something, isn't it? Okay. So the point where, thanks to analysis, this is not in the book,I'm going to have a stab. At this. This is speculation, okay. The inside shell of the craft must have had the green paint because British airspace. Said its non-arerodynamic paint, you would never paint the outside of a vehicle with. This green stuff. So I'm going to assume that that's the inside. Then you've got the aluminium foam and the resin adhesive, which sticks it to the honeycomb. Foil, which is that weird looking foil stuff. And of course, none of this material is in fact the same. It's all different. We assumed it was all made of the same stuff, but it's not.It's all different. And then you've got the outside of the craft, which is clearly the lantharnum, okay. Now Lantharnum, like I said, it pushes back, it distorts and it's covered in those rubbery. Green hexagons on the outside. Now that to me, that speaks of stealth because if it's pushing back, if you can't see the metal and you can't see the hexagons, then you can appear and you can disappear. You can come and go as you please, okay?So that's real proper super technology. The reason that we got all this debris is it hit trees. Now what that leads me to conclude is that it's not designed to hit trees. Well there you go. So that that leads you to conclude that it must be, somehow it must be pressurized inside. Or it's inside a bubble, it's inside a force field or it's coming out of another dimension.And what's happened is this thing has materialized directly in the path of the trees and just gone bomb, bomb straight through all this wood. Now you know that trees are only going to impact this at low impact because it's hitting the top of the tree branches. Remember what I said at the beginning, you can't break the lanthium using anything with. Pressure.You can't attack it with pressure or force, but you can snap it and if you got it really. Slow, it turns into eggshell. And what's happened is the trees are basically shattered, they're just annihilated on the side of this thing and the force of its travel has thrown all this stuff out onto the fields. Which leads me to conclude that it probably is based on all that information,it probably is sauce-shaped, it's rounded, okay. So then it gets really, really important at this point because we have a big, a really. Big unanswered question which again I don't ask in the book, I'll leave it to you guys. To work this one out. You thought you were getting away Scott-free without anything. Is it one of ours?Is it back-engineered? You know, Operation Paperclip PRODUCT, is it something that maybe the Americans acquired after the Second World War EVENT? Because it physically exists, okay. We're talking about something here that physically exists. We just have never seen it before, you know? Or, or could it potentially be one of theirs? Is it alien? Is it completely 110%? You know, crashed at Roswell GPE came from somewhere else built by another race.Bob Omb. PERSON End of story. Or, there is, there is the middle option, there's always the middle option. Could it be something that we've got whole love and back-engineered it? Is it just something that they've discovered that they're not telling us about? Well, the answer to that question is clearly yes, okay. Now, I said this in an interview because I've been doing a lot of interviews this last. Year, especially with America GPE.As you all know, there was the big, you know, disclosure thing. You know, people coming out into the courtrooms to say, yay or nay. And that went exactly where people in the UFO community expected it to go. It died. We never got any disclosure. So what I've been saying when I'm on interviews is, come on guys, we've got it.We've got this material. It's in the public domain. It's published. Here it is. We know what it is. Tellers.Tellers. Now we're not exactly kicking down the door of disclosure, but I think we're kind of knocking. At it and going, you know, tap, tap, tap, tap, come on. Open up. Tellers. Confess. Confess you beggars. Is it, you know, what is it? What are we looking at here? You know, it's time to fess up and be honest about it. Is it extraterrestrial?You know, what is it? Where is this going? Hang on, just give me a minute. I can become the proper storyteller now. I can sit down. I mean, back just won't take it for any length of a time.Oh, I've forgotten I left that on there. Okay. His name's Neil. Anybody in the no? Okay, Neil. And a gram of alien. All right. Oh, you're all thinking, what's he going to do with that? Do you know, I can't see you wearing this? Let's have a look. Yeah, you look. Yeah. Oh, it's really hard to hear anybody you know from up here. All right, a pleasure. There you go. You can have Neil. I was going to drag this out. Do you remember that bit in many black? It's my favorite bit where he's got to answer the questionthere and there's a table and he goes, brilliant, brilliant. I was in tears. Right. Okay. The reason I sat down is I'm going to get all storyteller now. This is a bit Steve PERSON. I think really booked me to do. Here we go. Ideas. Okay. What are we looking at?What is this all about? Okay. Well, I've started off by sort of giving you the nuts and bolts. Okay, that's the physical side of it. But ultimately, what we really want to know is, you know, what's out there. Where are we going to go with that?Hats off to Steve PERSON for doing this conference because it's massive crossover, enormous crossover. My specialist subject is actually in other things, you know, as was introduced. I'm an archaeologist really. I do history and things like that. But when you do history, it does lead you to speculate. And I've got a couple of books out and I have actually speculated in these books about where.I think stuff's coming from. So I think that's really why Steve PERSON got me up here. So let's dive down that rabbit hole. Okay. We're still talking about the universe here and I've set the ground rules. Okay. We know it's fire, water, earth there and spirit. We know what's out there. That's physically in a nutshell what we're dealing with. Okay. Pretty much everything falls into that category.If it's here, that's the kicker, right? If it's here, if it's physically here, it doesn't matter actually, really at the end. Of the day, if, you know, a poltergeist comes walking in and gets hold of your coffee table and chucks it, well, it's just physically, physically moved a physical object in our dimension. Okay. So we need to bear in mind as a massive element of physicality in all this.Okay. Are they UFOs? Are we dealing with flying sources and stuff like that? Okay. The idea of putting this and actually came about because I did an interview for a company called Drake ORG, Michigan GPE. We can get another advert in here. People might me for years because I did a TV series called Lost Treasures with ITV ORG. And they said, oh, we want to see it again. It only took 18 years to get it onto YouTube ORG. So it's finally onto YouTube. Anyway, they collared me this particular company and they said, your hobby is the moonlandings. Isn't it? And I'm like, yes. I've done it for years. They're like, okay, we want the truth about the moon landing. So I did a 10-minute interview that lasted an hour and a half and it was hilariously. Funny because you can just tear the moon landings to bits, absolutely rip into them now. There'll be believers in here and there'll be disbelievers in here and there'll be people. Sat on the fence. So I'm going to come in. I'm going to come in hard and heavy. Okay. Because this is important. Okay. That's the debris field that surrounds planet Earth LOC.Okay. And you're going to tell me they sent a tin can out to the moon through that. No, no, forget it. This is science. This is proper science. This is a plot based on what they know is up there and it's increasing exponentially. Every year, every time a satellite breaks up, every time, you know, we get a comic going. Past or, you know, a couple of meteorites burn up in the atmosphere. The debris up there now is so bad, the Russians NORP have gone on record and said scientifically.We're not even going to be able to put satellites up if this continues. It's so bad. And barely mind, most of those little fragments have traveled in at 1,600 miles per hour. So you send a tin can through there and it's going to be like putting it through a million. Shotgun blasts. You're not going to survive.So the whole idea of, oh, yes, you know, Elon Musk. It's colonized Mars LOC. No, you've got to get out of that first. You've got to get past that. So you've got to start to dig a bit. Okay.So I am going down the rabbit hole here. I mean, this is like conspiracy theory. You know, it's your right down there with this one. No, no, I don't think we went to the moon LOC at all, you know, flags waving in the wind. And things made of balsa wood and photographs that suddenly appear from nowhere. Oh, I could just go on and on and on.On and on and on. You know, one's wall stuck for a man. Okay, who photographed him? Right. I'm not even going to go there. But yeah, basically we're stuck.So you're now stuck with the idea, you know, that little green men coming from Venus LOC are. Not going to get a disc through that. They're not going to get a metal disc through that either. So however they're getting here on whatever we're seeing, they are not physically flying. Here. They're not coming in that way.They're coming in some other way. Okay. So again, you can see what I'm doing. I'm building. I'm building a case bit by bit. Okay. So again, you can see what I'm doing. I'm building. I'm building a case bit by bit. Okay. So I've got to bear in mind because this is Uber ORG important. This is super, super, super important. The middle bit of that. So if you can see where it sort of comes out into the, you know, Richard of York, a battle. In vain because you've got the rainbow there in the middle, that's us. So what about the rest of it? So the bit going that way and the bit coming this way on the big one.So you got the, you know, the green bit over here and you got the blue bit over there. And that's the bit we can't see. That's what we don't see. So then you start thinking, that means I'm only seeing probably what four or five percent of what's in this room now. Okay. And I'm only talking about light.I'm not talking about anything else. I'm just talking about wavelengths that Tesla ORG would have identified as being part of the light spectrum. Okay. So you're not telling me that there can't be all the things that live in that. Do you remember those five elements at the beginning? The last one was, you know, you had fire water, earth, air and spirit, spirit.What the hell is spirit? Okay. Maybe you're looking at the answer. You're looking at, or some of the answers there. You've then got other things as well because you've also got wavelength and energy, both, of which generate measurable frequencies and measurable graphs and, you know, things like that. So you're obviously dealing here with a multiverse. That's what it is. It's basically it's a multiverse. There's lots of things going on. So many things are happening all at once,all at the same time. Okay. That's interesting. I've just vanished. Oh, hang on. This is important. I need to put this in because also you've got what you've got the physical stuff. So you know, as an archaeologist, for me, time is really important. Okay. I was chatting to somebody about this earlier on as well.It's another dimension. So we need to look at this. We need to look at this a bit better. Now, I have put this in print. This is in one of the books that I've done. Everything that time is that shape.There are some people in this. I remember this as a kid. You used to go in arcades near the big old pennies, penny arcades, and they'd have these. These things for charity. You'd have this big spinny thing for charity and you'd put the coin in and it'd go whizzing. Round and as it spiraled down, it got faster and faster and faster and faster.And then, for an instant, it just froze. It was just going really, really quickly, and it just hung there and then it went and dropped. Inside the thing. You've got the Asabov PERSON so below principle here and I've been thinking about it for many years and I was thinking, I wonder if time works like that. Did we have, for example, did we have at the beginning when time for us began? Did we have a huge amount of time,massive amount of time, which then got less and less as things have began to devolve? We ended up with something that looks a bit like that. So effectively, time is getting quicker. There'll be some older folks like me in the room thinking, where did that time go? It feels like it's ending quicker. Definitely since dare I say it, lockdown, people are starting to think, wow, things are really accelerating. Things seem to be picking up speed. Things are happening and awful, a lot quicker. You actuallymight be right. And then you've got things like when they're looking at the kings of Babylon, 226,000 years. For eight kings to rain before the flood. Now, the flood, to me, because I'm not talking, no, as I'm talking about 88 different flood. Stories that every culture on planet Earth has. Something clearly significant happened. You've also got the Gulf of Mexico LOC and that's a meteorite crater. Yeah, that's a lot of meteorite, smacks into Gulf of Mexico LOC, starts continental drift.Wipes out the dinosaurs. So you're looking at some of these big, these really big, you know, cataclysms and what have. You! Before that, people livedlysms and what have. You. Before that, people lived significantly longer. You had more time. Things were bigger.You know, it was a different world. The fact that it's a different world, though, is really important and it's important actually. To the main thread of what we're looking at. Really important because one of the books I did, Crystal Skulls and Human Heads WORK_OF_ART, which... is like a couple of books back, was looking at these guys.And when I was looking at these guys, I started looking at human species. Okay, there's as many human species as there are species of anything else. Okay, there's lots of us. But it started to raise some important questions. Even those extinction events, some of these species disappeared. So where there used to be,at least we know about when I did the book, there was nine. Species known. Can you believe it? They now know that there's 27 different species of us. So you got these tiny little homofluurances, you know, living out in the Philippines GPE, these. Three foot high hobby people. Why not include giants, you know, biblical stuff? Yeah, you're on the same page, guys. 35 foot tall, you know, exactly the same thing happens with the rest of planet Earth LOC.So why shouldn't that be true of us? The palm cat will sit in the palm of your hand, but you end up with a liger, a lion. Cross with a tiger. It's the size of a horse. You know, so I'm only talking like, this is fact, this is how planet Earth LOC operates. You know, it's literally that simple.You're born, you live, you die. That's it. That's the rule. That's how it works. Well, I got to looking at these guys. And this is a particular kind of species.These are the stretchheads, guys. And these are quite significant because the heads are bigger. And, you know, shoot, it's a duck. Let's get obvious here. If they've got bigger heads, they've got bigger brains. Okay. So what happens if one of these guys gets born with the same talents as somebody like. Albert Einstein PERSON. But the difference is his brain is three and a half size bigger than ours. Okay.That's one hell of a wet computer to use modern technology. That is a lot of computing power in that head. And then you get ten of them in the same room. And somebody walks in and goes, how do you build a pyramid? They go, hang on a minute. It gives us a couple of minutes. Right, there's a formula just like thatbecause they can do it. They've got the power to do it. I think this is the missing bit. So I've done ancient aliens and I've chatted to loads of guys on ancient aliens. And I'm in that kind of thing. So like I said, Steve PERSON wants me to blow the lid off this. I'm going to blow the lid off it. And that is my argument is these guys are the guys that are doing it. Forget little extraterrestrial blocs and all the rest of it.These guys are doing it because they are super intelligent, hyper-intelligent megabends. And the really sad thing is that that species only died out, archaeologically, about 400 years ago. So if you were alive, let's say you were alive in, you know, this country in late medieval. Times, you could get one of these guys with the big heads traded in from Russia GPE. They were trading people in with these enormous heads. Ladies were particularly sought after, you know, these huge heads.Can you imagine that? This lady comes walking in. By modern standards, you'd be like, hang on a minute. You've just bought a slave and she's a lady and this is non-PC NORP and we really can't be doing. With this. And the guy would be like, nope, I've just bought a computer. That's what he's done. That's what he's done. These ladies were super sought after. But they werethere, the prockies, the prockies in South America LOC, you know. Okay, so my argument is if these guys were around, let's say they were around, you know. Well, they'd have to be around pre-dinosaur, otherwise they didn't go extinct. Okay, so, you know, you're looking at a really strange world. You know, if you could, people say this, if I could get in a time machine and I could. Travel back in time, no, no. As soon as you get to Tudor Times, you wouldn't understand even the English LANGUAGE they were speaking.You know, it's a different world. And the further back, you go, I don't know if anybody remembers those books, Dinoopia WORK_OF_ART. Where they put dinosaurs and people together. Well, trust me, it was far, far more bizarre than Denotopia WORK_OF_ART this. What do you reckon to these guys managing to work out time travel or interdimensional? Technologies or pyramids? You know, we can't get our heads around pyramids. You know, how did they manage to work out that the Great Pyramid, the middle one of theThree on Giza, is absolutely banging the middle of the total landmass of planet Earth LOC. And it is. How the hell do you work that out? Well, I give you the answer. If you've got heads the size of these blokes and you can sit together, also they've got a super understanding. They've got an absolutely size of these blokes and you can sit together, also they've got a super understanding.They've got an absolutely incredible understanding of what I'm talking about today. They already have the answers to all the questions that I'm raising here. You know, I think that's the case. Well, it does raise an interesting possibility if that's the case, because if they crack time travel and they crack the problems of dimensions, then you're into a situation where time is no longer important.Space is no longer important. All that stuff I showed you that we can't see is no longer important because you can. Just go from wherever you are to wherever you want to be, because it all exists all. At the same time. be, because it all exists all. At the same time. Okay, I can see heads going. You know, there's a big one gone off back there.You can just, whoa, hang on a minute. Whoa, whoa. Now, I'm not saying that that applies to us. We can't go down that particular route, but they certainly could. They certainly had that level of understanding, you know, just absolutely, you know. And the reality of this, because you've got to get your head around it, is actually the idea that we're evolving things will always get better. No, no, we're not. Remember that example I gave you,things are actually spiraling down. Okay, that's what the evidence is telling us. Okay, as an archaeologist, when I go back to the Ice Age and I look at, you know, primitive. People running around in skidels, skids, you know, throwing harpoons at flipping woolly. Mammoths, you know, all that nonsense. That's what it is, it's nonsense. What you're looking at are human beings who from an environmental point of view are permanently,and perfectly in sync with their environment. They know everything. They know exactly how to survive. They know every plant, they know every sight, they know every energy, they know every animal. You know, exactly, exactly how to fit into their world. And that's what we've lost.We've just lost it completely. Okay, blame the Romans NORP. I always do. Everybody blames the Romans NORP, you know, we're a nice, comfortable roundhouses. We can live there for thousands of years. Nobody even knows we've been there. No, change your house for a square house. Build a square house, you know, hypercourse, interior heating, glass windows,you know. All the latest technology. They're rubbish. She's still here 2,000 years later. Okay, we're digging it up. You know, so from an archaeological point of view, that's a disaster. You know, that is not green. Go back to things like the Neolithic and the Mesolithic. We can't find where they lived. No idea. Yes, they clearly lived because they were clearly there, but they were in tune with the environment. They just blend in, disappear. Who knows where the hell they are? That's the kind of level ofcivilization, because that's true civilization. The ability to live forever indefinitely with the resources you have and manage the. Planet around you in such a way that you're not doing any damage to it. So it's going to go on forever, isn't it? Of course, it's going to last longer. You know, we come along and we're like, I wonder what happened if we test a nuclear weapon? Whoa, wait a minute.Whoa, look at this. Things are all going down the tubes. I wonder why. So actually, forget evolution. Just forget it. You know, Darwin PERSON was right about modification, but not about evolution.I'll put these up because I'm not talking nonsense here. You can find all this if you know where to look. If you want to have a nosy on the internet, you'll get all sorts of stuff. I think the top one's ancient civilizations, middle one's time looking at time travel. Time is an illusion. I love the little, I had to put him in. Mr. Emoto PERSON, he's great, okay, because he's a kind of scientist after my own heart. Gets a bowl of water, you know, and looks at this bowl of water and swears at it andabuses the boil of water. You know, let's abuse this water, freezes it and gets different shapes. Ice patterns out of it because the water's recorded what he's done. That's like, wow, you've got physical evidence that our very existence creates or doesn't. Create in the world around us. Okay, now you really down the rabbit hole. Okay, you're probably bouncing somewhere around the bottom of the rabbit hole at this point.You nearly can face to face with the rabbit. You know, the middle one does that as well. You know, you go, oh, yeah, I just want to go and get a tomato. So you go to get a tomato plant. And you go, the tomato plant goes, oh, oh, oh. The only reason you can't hear it is because you can't hear it.But yeah, the scientists can. Because it's in that frequency that we don't understand, you know, oh, that'd be terrible. If you're walking down the street, you know, treading on dandelions and earwigs and goodness. Art. You wouldn't survive, would you? You'd just be like, oh, but I'm not going anywhere. I'm staying here. I'm not moving again.But it's true. The world is doing things and we're not entirely totally aware of what the world's doing. Cryptozoology, whoa, love it. All you cryptid hunters and never stop, keep looking. That's a fossil. That is an actual fossil creature that really existed and man does it look like Bigfoot PERSON.You know what I'm saying. So now you really are into what Steve PERSON wanted. And this is the idea that somehow all the boundaries just get blurred. Okay, what about the ghost of a Bigfoot PERSON? What about a Bigfoot PERSON who's learned how to time travel from the guys with the big heads? You know, where are these guys coming from?This is where we need, we need as a uphology community to be talking to other communities. You know, me as an archaeologist go out to Egypt GPE and chat in a way, you know, to somebody. Out in Egypt GPE and he's saying, yeah, this huge pyramid is a massive electrical generator. You know, you can shove razor blades on a little sharp and it protects meat and all that preserves. It and I'm thinking, yeah, but what happens if these guys learned off the guys with the big heads? What happens if it's not just that? What happens if Tesla ORG was right?What happens if that's what this is all about? What happens if there's stuff going on in the planet that we just don't know about? You know, massive great quartz ball that we're on, you know, full of gravity and electricity. And we're whizzing through the cosmos, you know, and it's like, what is going on that? We're not getting. You know, what are we missing here? Nostradamus PERSON, there's a prophecy and he prophesies that in theearly 21st century there will. Be a massive revelation, a huge leap forward in the field of light, wavelengths, and he speaks of it as light in terms of enlightenment, you know, light coming. But that's frequencies again, you're into frequencies. So the information is out there. If you go digging, you know, you'll find it. It is, it's definitely out there.I'm going to end with a story and it's an interesting story, okay? This is the darker side of eulology. The reason I put that up there is it its actually representation of the angel of death. Only he's not the angel of death you'd be familiar with. It's not the dude in the black cloak with the size. He's a multi-frequency light being, okay?Now all the things that I'm chucking up on the screen there, to what extent are they all? Linked? Are they, do they overlap? Are they all the things that I'm chucking up on the screen there, to what extent are they all? Linked? Are they, do they overlap? Are they all the same, you know? You know, if you turn up Mugi PERSON, you know, knock on the Pope's door, go and have a chat with. The Pope, tell me about angels.Oh, hang on a minute. That's just the same as the ETS that we study, you know? Demons, what about demons and all the rest of it and stuff that comes through taro? Reading and stuff that comes through Ouija boards and this, and you're, okay, when you start looking at the evidence, the evidence is very similar to a lot of the other stuff that we're getting. There's so many overlaps, you know, so many huge overlaps and you end up wondering what?The hell's going on. There'll be a lot of people in here who are thinking, okay, he's just talking rubbish. Absolutely nonsense. Well, okay, I'm going to drop a bit of personal stuff. I've started doing this. You know, when you get to that certain age where you think, I'm not going to be here.Forever, you know, when you kind of, you know, the big six, oh, you, everyone's like that. Big five, oh, you know, forget that, wait till you go past the big six, oh, you start. Needing bastules, you know, to get through talks and stuff like that. You start to feel your mortality, you know, and you think, I'll put it on the end down. There, death, death and the dead, okay? Well, maybe that's what it's all about.When you drop, when you drop from one dimension to another, you're no longer tied to this physical. Realm. You become something else, you know, and there's so much evidence that you then convert either. Into light or energy or, you know, and then all of a sudden it, you're not tied down. You're off into the rest of what I've shown you somehow. You know, there's a biblical verse somewhere that says when you die,you'll know it all. You'll know everything instantly. Glory PERSON, reveal to you, you know, nobody gets out of here alive. I'm not ending on a depressing note. I actually think that's brilliant. It's like, get your ticket to ride, you know. We'll all have the answer. That's really positive. You know, you get to the end, you'll have the answer. I'm going to tell you a story. It's a bit of a strange story because you're probably thinking all this has nothing to. Do with the real world. It doesn't really impact on this, you know. Or, I don't believe you.I don't believe what you're saying. It's, you know, skepticism. Okay, that's healthy. I'll tell you a story. And it is personal. Like I said, I'm past 60, so I'm allowed to do it. Me dad, me dad always had this thing and I will end on this story. I know I'm going on a bit, but me dad had this thing where he just wanted to die at. Home. You know, people want to do that. And he was 89. He had Alzheimer's. He just wanted to die at home. And I remember the last thingI remember seeing him, he sat in his chair and his bedroom. Like that and he's looking out of the window. Now, this is where it gets a bit weird because his window in his bedroom faces west. So he's watching the sun go down this lovely golden sunset and it's Friday. So he's, you know, and he goes to bed as normal and I go to bed as normal and all the rest of it. And I'm just thinking, okay, I trained, I'm going to confess here.I trained in the ministry. So I qualified as a reverent. So I do a lot of biblical stuff. Okay. And there's this legend. So it's a bit like me sitting here telling you stories.There's this legend that as long as you read in the Bible WORK_OF_ART, as long as you're biblical. If you're praying and you've got some community, community, community with God, then the angel. Of death can't interfere. So I go to bed on the Friday and I wake up on what I think is the Saturday. Let's get up on the Saturday. So I'm waking up on the Saturday and I wake up on what I think is the Saturday. Let's get up on the Saturday. So I'm waking up on the Saturday and I'm thinking, it's somewhat wrong here. I'm not sure what's going on here.So the step tool comes in and says, you need to come and see your dad. Like, really? She said, yeah, and guess what? I said, what? She said, no, it's not Saturday. It's Sunday.It's Sunday morning. And I was no word of light and I was fine. Nothing wrong with me. I'm perfectly healthy when I went to bed on the Friday, but this time it's Sunday morning. And she said, you know what happened on the Saturday? I said, I don't want that. Your dad passed away. He just passed away on the Saturday night.The first thing that went through my mind was this beggar, angel of death. The only way that my dad could get what he wanted, because that's how he wanted to pass. Over. So I'm overjoyed. I'm, you know, he died peacefully in his bed and he went and off to the west, you know? And that the only way this beggar could get close was to get rid of me, because I'm in. The way, you know, I'm the person who is the believer, you know, I'm the one that's talking. To God. I'm the religious one and whatever reading the Bible WORK_OF_ART and the rest of it. But the angel of death, you know, I'm the one that's talking to God. I'm the religious one and whatever reading the Bible WORK_OF_ART and the rest of it. But the angel of death couldn't get near him, couldn'tenter the building unless he put me out first. So I'm there on the Sunday hand thinking, you know, you can listen to all the legends. You can read all the scriptures, you can talk to all these Jewish NORP guys that have this as a belief and all the rest of it. But when it happens for real, you know, when the rubber hits the road and it suddenly gets personal and you think, okay, okay, there's more reality to all this than any of us could. Ever imagine? You know, you just, you can't imagine how much of this and how real this this is.And it does impact, it does impact on the real world. So because I was given the not long ago, you know, they don't kind of, you know, drag. You off with a big hook. They just abduct you here. I want to meant to say, by the way, you know, when they throw these, these bouquets of flowers. Out, you know, weddings, you know, overcatches the bouquet, you know,is next to get married. I've got to say with that little alien bloke overcatches that is the next to be abducted. So I hope you're okay. Drive carefully when you're going home tonight, you know what I mean. So I think we've hit the bottom of that rabbit hole as far down as I can go. If you want to come and catch me later, I'll be downstairs. I might keep the silly coat on so you know where I am.Yeah, you like that. It's good in it. It's good. So yeah, I'll stay a zam. Let's just do this. I've got to do this because if I don't do this, I'll get shouted out.This is, this is the next bit. I think there we go. And then there's like, you know, Philip Mantle PERSON, publisher, flying this press, he said, you. No, he sent us all emails saying, please plug the books. You've got to put the books. You've got to sell the books. So this will just release self. Yeah, light shines in the darkness. Put the dance. I'll never overcome it. Thank you very much forjoining me on the paranormal report. Click on those links and have fun unraveling the truth.